These are grave times. Our Prime Minister is an incompetent and delusional megalomaniac. Our country is being polarised across religious lines because the ruling party deems it electorally advantageous. Despite bonanzas such as low oil prices and good monsoons, our economy has gone backwards under this regime, mainly because of Tughlaqesque misadventures like demonetisation. Across the country, millions of young people are coming into the jobs market and finding that there are no jobs for them. There is unrest.

All this is fertile ground for a resurgent Opposition with new ideas. And yet, all we are getting is a return of the ‘same-old same-old’. There seems to be a consensus among Delhi liberals that because we desperately need a strong Opposition, we must desperately prop up Rahul Gandhi. At one level, for these three reasons, this seems to make sense: One, the Congress is still the only pan-India party besides the BJP; Two, the Gandhi family is so entrenched that no alternative leaders have emerged; Three, Rahul is, at the least, a well-meaning, earnest chap, not a venal sociopath.

However, this is a terrible idea. It is bad for the Congress, because they need rejuvenation, not this slow slide to death. It is bad for the country, because we need a strong Opposition. There are two reasons, one small and one big, on why the Congress needs to move away from the Gandhis.

Reason one: There is no reason to believe that Rahul has suddenly gained the competence (or even the intelligence) that he has so clearly lacked all these years. In the past, he has repeatedly made a fool of himself in speeches and interviews, which are embarrassingly numerous on YouTube. His new supporters point to his recent talks and interviews in the US, but those contain mainly rehearsed talking points, so clumsily articulated that it’s sometimes obvious that he’s mugged them up.

He says many of the right things — but so did Modi before he came to power. Words are not enough. Rahul’s party was in power for most of the six-plus decades before Modi came around — and it did not walk this talk. That is why Modi got his chance.

What is more problematic is that he also says many of the wrong things. He praises bank nationalisations, for example, and seems to approve of Indira Gandhi. (More on this in the next point.) He doesn’t seem to have a basic grasp of economics — or indeed, the capacity to think critically about these subjects. In other words, it appears that he still is what I had referred to him as many years ago: a handsome village idiot, albeit one with a smart team that preps him well, and a witty new social media staff.

I have often been mistaken, and would be delighted to be proved wrong on this. Here’s one way to do this: rather than give rehearsed speeches and answer softball Q&As, let Rahul give an interview to an independent, bipartisan journalist who will ask probing questions about public policy to understand the depth of his thinking on these issues. I nominate myself for this. If he can’t hold his own in an interview with me, he doesn’t deserve to be Prime Minister.

That will never happen. Meanwhile, here’s my second reason for why we need to move beyond the Gandhis.

The sharpest criticism against Modi is that he is the true successor to Indira. He has her authoritarian streak; and his economic policies are as damaging to this nation as hers. How, then, can a party that has portraits of Indira in all its offices be a credible Opposition?

Harmful as Jawaharlal Nehru’s economic thinking was — the command-and-control mindset that Modi shares — he was otherwise a great statesman, and his economic ideas were the fashion of the time. It is easy to give him the benefit of the doubt. But it is hard to be gracious about Indira.

I often make the point that some bad economic policies can be termed crimes on humanity. Indira carried out a series of policies — her bank nationalisations, FERA (1976), the Urban Land Ceiling Act (1976), the Industrial Disputes Acts of 1976 and 1982, alongside the many controls she imposed on the economy — that kept millions of Indians poor for decades longer than they should have been.

The commentator Nitin Pai once estimated that a one per cent rise in India’s GDP brings two million people out of poverty. This damage that Indira’s policies did to the country are unseen and unacknowledged, especially by her party.

What is even more egregious is that Indira did not implement these out of conviction, in which case she would be wrong but not necessarily evil. (Hanlon’s Razor.) Her sharp move leftward came because she needed to differentiate herself from the Congress establishment, and began as an act of political positioning. And then, she got into full populist mode with attractive slogans like Garibi Hatao , which seemed to make sense as her policies harmed the rich. That zero-sum vision of the world she sold was wrong, and her policies harmed the poor much more in the long run.

It is the damage inflicted by the Congress for over 60 years that set Modi up for his resounding win in 2014. The Congress needs to come to terms with that, and articulate a new vision. New ideas will only come with new leadership. And those who support the Congress have a responsibility to demand just that. Their message to the party should be, “Don’t keep taking us for granted. We deserve better. The country deserves better.”

(Views are personal)

Amit Varma is a novelist. He blogs at indiauncut.com ; @amitvarma

comment COMMENT NOW