Multinational accounting firms face the heat

K.R.Srivats | Updated on February 25, 2018 Published on February 25, 2018

In a 75-page landmark judgment, the apex court Bench of Justices A K Goel and U U Lalit also ruled that the expert committee may consider the need for an appropriate legislation for the oversight of profession of auditors.   -  iStockphoto

Supreme Court asks Centre to set up 3-member expert panel to review legal framework

An oversight mechanism to regulate multinational accounting firms (MAFs) on the touchstone of ethics is finally on the cards.

The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to set up a 3-member expert panel to decide whether and to what extent the current legal framework needs revisit so as to appropriately discipline and regulate MAFs for violation of code of ethics and reciprocity provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act.

In a 75-page landmark judgment, the apex court Bench of Justices A K Goel and U U Lalit also ruled that the expert committee may consider the need for an appropriate legislation for the oversight of profession of auditors.

The law could be patterned on the Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002 and the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 in US or any other appropriate mechanism, the Bench suggested disposing of two petitions -- an appeal against a Karnataka High Court order and a writ petition filed by a NGO, Centre for Public Interest Litigation.

The Bench also said that accounting firms could not be left to self-regulate themselves and the issue of separate oversight body for auditing work and updating the existing legal framework appear to be necessary.

The apex court felt that it appears necessary to realise that auditing business is required to be separated from the consultancy business.

The Bench also wants the Government appointed expert panel to examine the question whether on account of conflict of interest of auditors with consultants, the auditors' profession may need an exclusive oversight body.

 The Centre has been tasked to set up the 3-member expert committee within two months. Report of the committee may be submitted three months thereafter, the Supreme Court has said.

The Bench also faulted the CA Institute for not taking appropriate action to uphold the law although its committee of experts had in July 2011 itself concluded that MAFs were involved in violating ethics and law.

"The ICAI ought to constitute an expert panel to update its enquiry", the Supreme Court has said.

Petitioners' case

The main point was that the principle of reciprocity under Section 29 of the CA Act, Section 25 prohibiting corporates from chartered accountancy practice and code of ethics prohibiting advertisement and fee sharing are flouted by MAFs.

MAFs also violate FDI policy in the field of accounting, auditing, book keeping, taxation and legal services, they submitted.

It was contended that MAFs are illegally operating in India with the help of Indian chartered accountancy firms and providing accounting, auditing, book keeping and taxation services.

It was being argued that no effective steps were being taken to enforce the law in force although the MAFs are operating in India in violation of law in a clandestine manner.

Published on February 25, 2018

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.