Agri Business

Proposed ban on 27 pesticides: Anxious agrochem industry drawing up legal strategy

Rahul Wadke Mumbai | Updated on June 18, 2020 Published on June 18, 2020

The agrochemical industry, worried by the proposed ban on 27 pesticides by the Centre, is drawing up a legal strategy to counter it. However, internal documents prepared by industry experts show that continued manufacture of four pesticides on the list would be almost impossible to defend in a court of law due to their high toxicity.

The continued production of another 11 pesticides would also be very difficult or extremely difficult to justify by the companies.

The big players in the industry have prepared internal detailed presentations about the legal fight, which were reviewed by BusinessLine. Every pesticide based on the ability of the companies to defend the chemicals in a court of law has been analysed in the presentations.

 

‘Undefendable’ pesticides

The four pesticides identified as impossible to defend are carbosulfan, dicofol, methomyl and monocrotophos. These are already in the red category, which in trade parlance means highly toxic.

Monocrotophos is an organo-phosphorus insecticide, which is extremely toxic to birds and poisonous to mammals. It is used to kill a variety of sucking and boring insects and pests. The Food and Agriculture Organisation and the WHO have encouraged countries to phase out this highly hazardous pesticide because of major health risks, but in India, it continues to be produced, used and exported.

The presentation, on the other hand, has pointed out that a pesticide such as malathion is relatively easy to defend as data on its bio-efficacy, persistence and residue in the environment can easily be generated. It is banned only in two countries, which can be cross-verified. The pesticide can be cleared from the banned list with the help of a good legal defence.

 

The Centre started the review process of pesticides in 2013. The Union Agriculture Ministry shortlisted 66 pesticides for review and also formed the Anupam Varma Committee to look into the issue. After the Committee report was submitted, 18 pesticides were banned immediately and 27 were to be reviewed in 2018 but not banned.

However, on May 14, 2020, the order was issued with a proposed ban on 27 pesticides, but the final ban has not been placed. Exports have been allowed on a case-to-case basis. The final date calling all suggestions and objects on the pesticides has been extended till August 11.

May hurt exports

Vice President of Gharda Chemicals and board member of Pesticides Manufacturers and Formulators Association of India, KN Singh, said that most of the chemicals are on the list due to wrong information being provided to the decision-makers in the government. If the chemicals are banned, then India will lose a minimum of ₹12,000 crore in exports to China, Singh said. The domestic market and the Make in India story will also be impacted. If the ban is imposed, then it will certainly reach the court of law, Singh added.

BusinessLine also reached out to market majors such as Rallis India Ltd, which said it did not have a comment to offer. Indofil Industries Ltd did not respond to an email query, while UPL Ltd said that at present the company did not have any plan of taking legal action.

Published on June 18, 2020
  1. Comments will be moderated by The Hindu Business Line editorial team.
  2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be published.
  3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters, or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text. (example: u cannot substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
  4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
  5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.