Logistics

Shipping Corporation’s diverse asset portfolio could be a deal-breaker

P Manoj MUMBAI | Updated on October 01, 2019 Published on October 01, 2019

Shipping Corporation of India’s (SCI) diverse vessel portfolio could be a potential deal breaker when the government decide to privatize India’s biggest ocean carrier which is a navratna PSU, says industry experts.

The Mumbai-based fleet owner runs 62 ships that includes crude oil tankers, very large crude carriers, petroleum product carriers, liquefied petroleum gas carriers, bulk carriers, container ships and off-shore support vessels with a combined value of at least $1 billion.

“It is too spread out in terms of asset class,” said the chief executive of a Singapore-based shipping company. “It will be a tough task to sell the whole company because of the sheer size and the varied portfolio,” he said asking to be named.

Read more: Cabinet to take crucial call on divestment this week

Typically, global fleet owners tend to focus on one segment of the shipping industry. “If you look at public companies, they believe in one story such as oil super tankers or gas carriers. There is some rationale behind that. They think they can create maximum value in that business,” he said.

Given this, there are others who suggest that breaking up SCI based on asset class would be a better way to sell the company.

“Breaking it up would be a better bet because with the current format I don’t know how many buyers will be interested. Chopping the company into pieces and putting the ships for sale would attract higher interest. Having said that, do you think the government will ever do such a thing. This will require SCI to be de-listed, segregation of liabilities and so on. It’s very difficult to break-up it up,” said a shipping industry consultant.

Privatization, when approved by the government, would come at a time when the industry is struggling with low freight rates, except for the rare intermittent spikes, for many years since the 2008 financial melt-down.

“But, that makes it attractive for a buyer, right. When you are buying something in a down market, the intrinsic value is always higher, therefore it looks attractive,” the consultant pointed out.

“The point here is, it is very complex. We have seen it in the past also when the government tried to privatize SCI in early 2000. Then, a couple of non-shipping players had put in their bids and the sale process was eventually called off,” he said.

“The deal will make sense if somebody is looking at it purely from an India exposure point of view,” he said.

This is unlikely. No foreign shipping company has set up shop in India due to tight regulations, though, the country permits 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) in shipping from 2001.

Another key issue

Currently, local shipping companies get a right to match the lowest rate offered by a foreign flag in tenders issued by state-run firms under the chartering guidelines framed by the director general of shipping (DGS). If Indian shipping companies decline, the foreign flag ship is allowed to carry the cargo.

A government plan to re-write the RoFR rules by giving top priority to Indian-built ships for transporting state-owned cargo has been challenged in courts and the case is yet to be decided.

All of SCI’s ships have been built in overseas yards and the company would be hit if this policy is implemented.

A former director at SCI said that potential buyers would be attracted by, apart from the fleet, the real estate held by the company. The company’s real estate includes the 19-storeyed head-quarters in South Mumbai and land holdings elsewhere in the city.

SCI is India’s biggest ocean carrier, owning about a third of India’s shipping tonnage (capacity) and is 63.75% owned by the government.

Published on October 01, 2019
  1. Comments will be moderated by The Hindu Business Line editorial team.
  2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be published.
  3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters, or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text. (example: u cannot substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
  4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
  5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.