Comments
Amid a raging controversy over disinvestment of the erstwhile VSNL, the Tatas today hit back at the Government, saying the company made several attempts since 2005 onward for the demerger of surplus land but the Telecom Ministry’s response is still awaited.
In a letter to the Telecom Minister, Mr Kapil Sibal, the Tata Communications Chairman, Mr Subodh Bhargava, gave a summary of the sequences of events since 2005, which also have concurrence of two directors nominated by the Government.
The Tatas’ letter comes in the wake of Mr Sibal raising concerns over the disinvestment of VSNL in 2002, saying, “It has come to my notice that the disinvestment of Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd (VSNL) in 2002 does not seem to be fair and transparent.”
“Prima facie, the way issue of demerger of 773.13 acres of surplus land of VSNL was handled in 2002 and thereafter, not only the interests of investors but also the interests of the Government seems to have been adversely affected,” Mr Sibal said in an internal note asking the Telecom Secretary, Mr R. Chandrashekhar, to constitute a high-level committee to examine the issue in detail.
The Tatas, however, said, “The surplus land remains secured and unused by the company, waiting for a resolution of the demerger issue. The company continues to bear the expenses toward the surplus land’s upkeep and security as well as associated property taxes.”
More officially, Mr Bhargava said, the company has been unable to raise any non-debt funding during the last few years to support its investment and growth aspirations due to the non-resolution of this issue.
The former Disinvestment Minister, Mr Arun Shourie, under whom VSNL was sold to Tatas, had also said that if there was any delay in the demerger of the land and if a probe has to be ordered, “it should be against Mr P. Chidambaram and Mr Pranab Mukherjee, the past and present Finance Ministers in the UPA government in past seven years.”
Mr Shourie had defended the disinvestment, saying stringent conditions were laid down that prohibited the sale of surplus land by winning bidders.
Mr Bhargava said the company has participated in a few discussions and received some correspondence on surplus land, but those have been mostly in nature of seeking clarifications and the “DoT response to the draft scheme of demerger is still awaited.”
“You (Sibal) would agree that the demerger of this surplus land is waiting for the government’s response on the matter. You should also recognise that the Board of Tata Communications has two directors nominated by the government and they are apprised of all these issues,” Mr Bhargava said in the letter.
Tata Communications would be “more than willing to share all the facts with you or any officer deputed by you to look into the matter. More importantly, we welcome a speedy resolution of the demerger issue in the best interests of the company and all its shareholders.”
Comments
COMMENT NOW
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.