Markets

SAT asks SEBI to pay ₹50,000 costs for passing order sans ‘application of mind’

PALAK SHAH Mumbai | Updated on June 19, 2019 Published on June 19, 2019

File photo   -  SHAILESH ANDRADE

SEBI counsel pleaded with SAT for waiver of the costs

In a rare instance, the Securities and Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has imposed costs of ₹50,000 on SEBI in a case wherein the regulator had passed an ex-parte interim order restraining a trader from markets for indulging in fraudulent and manipulative trading. The Tribunal observed that despite there being ‘no shred of evidence’ to conclude that there was manipulative intent on the part of Sanjay Gupta, a trader, SEBI let its ex-parte order continue for a year without application of mind.

SEBI counsel pleaded with SAT for waiver of the costs and contended that “such imposition of costs would send a ripple down the throat of respondent (SEBI).” But SAT, which on earlier occasions too has reprimanded SEBI for its high-handedness in ex-parte orders, was in no mood to relent. “Be that as it may. We find that in given circumstances of the case, cost is justified.”

On March 12, BusinessLine reported that SAT had directed SEBI to use its powers to pass “ex-parte interim order” sparingly and only in “extreme urgent cases.”

Ex-parte injunction

An ex-parte injunction is mainly a direction/command to restrain, granted after hearing only one party in matters of ‘urgency’, without a notice to the other parties involved. A full hearing is held at a later date.

SAT’s view is that although SEBI is empowered to pass ex-parte orders, it cannot be done in every case and there has to be urgency. SAT said: “Whenever an ex-parte order is granted, endeavour should also be to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible no sooner when the party appears.” In the current case, an ex-parte order was passed on November 1, 2017, and the appellant (Gupta) filed his replies on November 3, November 28 and December 23, the same year. It took SEBI almost a year to dispose of the application.

“There was no real urgency to continue with the restraint order. Passing a confirmatory order virtually puts a stoppage on the appellant’s right to trade, ‘which in the instant case is based on non-consideration of evidence and is harsh and unwarranted’. The appellant is, thus entitled to get costs,” SAT said. The tribunal said it was “unable to accept the manner and approach of whole-time member of SEBI in the matter in such a casual manner without considering the evidence on record.”

SEBI found Gupta had sold shares of a company about which bulk (buy) SMSes were circulated. Based on an account statement, SEBI found money for the bulk SMSes went from an account where Gupta was a joint holder. But the bank later informed that Gupta was not a joint account holder and had even initiated legal dispute with his partners. Such facts should have been ascertained by the WTM (whole-time member) instead of mechanically treating a bank statement as the gospel truth. Also, a casual link should have been established indicating manipulation, SAT said.

Published on June 19, 2019

A letter from the Editor


Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.