World

All-male boards rule at hot Chinese companies from Xiaomi to Nio

Bloomberg | Updated on March 08, 2021

Of the 25 largest companies on the MSCI ACWI index without any female directors last year, 14 were Chinese, according to a report published in November by MSCI

Warren Buffett-backed carmaker BYD Co, Nike-rival ANTA Sports Products Ltd and Nasdaq-listed retailer JD.com are all emblematic of the global heft of China’s companies. The Chinese giants have another thing in common: None of them have women on their boards.

All-male boardrooms have long been common at stodgy state-owned Chinese enterprises, but they are also a fixture in many of the nation’s entrepreneurial young companies, spanning industries like e-commerce and electric vehicles that are investor favourites. That’s left the nation with the dubious distinction of being one of the worst places for boardroom gender diversity.

Of the 25 largest companies on the MSCI ACWI index without any female directors last year, 14 were Chinese, according to a report published in November by MSCI. Among them were big names like search-engine operator Baidu Inc and food-delivery company Meituan.

Also read: India Inc is willing to pay much more attention to fix the gender diversity problem : Abanti Sankaranarayanan

The list of Chinese companies with all-male boards also includes smartphone seller Xiaomi Corp. and viral video startup Kuaishou Technology, which earlier this year raised $5.4 billion in the biggest technology IPO since Uber. Investors and activists have been putting more attention on the issue, calling on the Hong Kong stock exchange – the favoured listing location for many of mainland China’s hottest companies –to close the gap with other markets that have better diversity records.

‘Set deadlines’

“It’s quite apparent that we are very behind,” said Teresa Ko, a partner and China chairman at the law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. A former chair of the Hong Kong stock exchange listing committee, she has called for the exchange to implement quotas requiring listed companies to add female directors within six years.

“We need deadlines,” she said. The status quo “is embarrassing and quite disappointing.”

Ko endorsed quotas last month in a report released by the Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries, which called for a target of at least 30 per cent female representation on boards. “Many companies here have an archaic concept of the role of boards,” BlackRock Inc managing director Amar Gill wrote in the report. “Female board presence is little more than at token levels.”

Hong Kong’s stock exchange said in a statement that it recognises the importance of diversity, pointing to a 2019 requirement that IPO applicants with all-male boards explain measures to achieve gender diversity on the board after listing.

A Baidu representative said in an emailed statement that women account for 46 per cent of management positions, and several top executives are women. It’s “a bit unfair to judge one company’s gender diversity situation by only studying its board members,” the representative said in the email.

“We are committed to creating a more diverse workforce at every level within our organisation,” NIO Inc, a Chinese EV maker with an all-male board, said in an email. Other companies didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Boards in Western countries continue to be heavily dominated by men, but in recent years many companies have added more women in response to pressure from investors, regulators and consumers.

Also read: Gender equality at workplace

All of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index have at least one female director, with women holding 28.8 per cent of board seats. California plans to require most publicly traded companies based there to have at least three female directors by the end of this year.

There’s been much less pressure on companies in China, where President Xi Jinping’s government hasn’t prioritised gender diversity in the boardroom and keeps a tight grip on the media. China ranked 106th out of 153 countries in the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index 2020 ranking.

At least for now, investors in some of China’s hottest companies don’t seem to be penalising them for having no female directors. Beijing-based electric-vehicle maker Li Auto Inc raised $1.1 billion in a Nasdaq initial public offering last July, and EV rival XPeng Inc. followed in August with a $1.5 billion IPO on the New York Stock Exchange.

NIO has seen its stock price rise more than 500 per cent since its New York debut in 2018.

Business incentives in diversity

Yet there are solid business incentives for companies to promote gender diversity in the boardroom, according to an S&P Global report published in February.

Also read: Women progressively lose the chance to ascend

“It brings a broader collection of experience, viewpoints and backgrounds which result in better decision-making,” S&P said. “Having more women on the board also tends to curb excessive risk taking, decrease aggressive tax strategies and improve firm reputation, earnings quality and sustainability performance.”

Hong Kong’s stock exchange, long a magnet for Chinese companies, has become an even more popular destination as US-China tensions have raised the risk of listing on the NYSE or Nasdaq. Shares of JD.com, which has no women on its five-member board, began trading in Hong Kong last June after a secondary listing. Nasdaq-listed Baidu has secured approval from the Hong Kong stock exchange for a second listing that could raise at least $3.5 billion, Bloomberg News has reported.

Hong Kong trailing

As mainland companies take a larger role in Hong Kong’s market, the city now trails not only regional rival Singapore but also South-east Asian countries like Malaysia regarding the percentage of companies with female directors.

“Promoting board diversity (with a particular emphasis on gender) will remain a priority to the Exchange,” Hong Kong Exchanges spokesman Henry Sung said in the emailed statement. “We will make further announcement to the market for any new consultations on this area in due course.”

Although the exchange in 2019 also began requiring companies to have board diversity policies, those steps have not been effective, said Ko.

“What has resulted is just a barrage of cut-and-paste disclosures,” she said. “You have to ask them to make measurable objectives, but because there is no real deadline to make any specific change, we are where we are.”

Some in the investment community are confident that Chinese companies will have to respond as pressure grows to focus on environmental, social and governance issues.

“There is this massive ESG trend that I don’t think any company can really ignore,” said Nasrine Ghozali, chief risk officer at Oasis Management Co. in Hong Kong and co-chair of the Hong Kong Board Diversity Initiative, with members such as Oasis, BlackRock and Manulife Asset Management.

“Our role as shareholders is to remind companies,” she said. “Often the response is pretty similar: We are working on it, we are thinking about it.”

Published on March 08, 2021

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor