Opinion

It’s not Silicon Valley

Nisha Gopalan | Updated on February 19, 2019 Published on February 19, 2019

Reality check on China’s tech supremacy push

Late Monday, the official Xinhua News Agency released details of the State Council’s Greater Bay Area plan — a project to knit together Hong Kong and Macau with nine mainland cities into a global innovation hub to rival California’s Silicon Valley. The trouble is, there’s little new on how authorities plan to make this grand vision into a reality.

Announced by Premier Li Keqiang in March 2017, the Greater Bay Area forms part of China’s push for supremacy in technology, while also binding the former European colonies more tightly into the country. Hong Kong residents, struggling with high housing prices, will have the opportunity to move across the border and work in state-owned companies while people moving the other way will gain access to the city’s education and health systems.

Under the 11-chapter blueprint, Hong Kong will focus on international finance, navigation and trade; Macau will be an international tourism destination; Guangzhou will serve as an administrative centre and gateway city; and Shenzhen will be a technology hub. In other words, the cities will continue to do more or less what they already do. Hong Kong is already the key initial public offering venue for Chinese firms, and an offshore yuan trading centre.

There are some extra gimmicks here and there, such as the curious idea of turning Macau into a trading platform for Portuguese-speaking countries such as Brazil. The city is a former Portuguese colony, but use of the language has faded and it’s spoken by only a small minority. Hong Kong will set up a financing and investment platform for the Belt and Road Initiative, though the city’s banks already have the capability to fund such projects if they are commercially attractive. There will be support to develop cross-border yuan reinsurance businesses, and so on.

The fundamental obstacles to the integration of Hong Kong and Macau into a mainland Chinese economic cluster go largely unaddressed. These include vastly different political and economic structures. The cities have their own, freely convertible currencies, separate passport and customs controls, and legal systems.

Hong Kong looks to be the likely loser. In the same breath as the blueprint pledges to uphold the one country, two systems framework that governed the city’s return to Chinese sovereignty, it talks of creating an international and market-oriented business environment based on rule of law, under the jurisdiction and legal framework of mainland China.

For Hong Kong entrepreneurs thinking of setting up over the border, there’s no word on whether they’ll continue to enjoy the city’s 17 per cent maximum income-tax rate. The mainland rate is 45 per cent for those earning more than 85,000 yuan ($12,500) a month.

There are undoubtedly advantages to being part of a bigger economic entity. The Bay Area region would have more than 67 million residents, a trillion-dollar economy and bigger exports than Japan, HSBC Holdings Plc has estimated. At the same time, the uncomfortable reality is that Hong Kong’s attractions for international business such as rule of law and free flow of information rest on its distinctness from the mainland system. The blueprint doesn’t explain how these advantages will be preserved while integrating the city more closely with its Chinese counterparts.

The blueprint’s failure to delineate clearly how Hong Kong’s status will be protected suggests either that the Bay Area plan is more hype than practical programme, or that political objectives will trump economic considerations. Neither conclusion is comforting.

Bloomberg

Published on February 19, 2019
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor