Need for rational, constructive voices

Sidharth Birla | Updated on January 11, 2018 Published on May 15, 2017

Let’s do things together Partnership’s what’s called for   -  wk 1003Mike/shutterstock.com

The business community has risen to the occasion in the past to contribute to the nation-building debate. It must do so now

Before I sign off from writing during summer the obvious flavour of the month is the completion of three years of the Government. I recall well the swearing-in ceremony in the blazing heat of New Delhi and the palpable enthusiasm generated by a new-look development agenda for the nation. The multi-faceted successes of the intervening period are creditable and have also helped India etch a new impression in the minds of global investors and political leaders.

I was impressed with a talk given recently by Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian. I enjoyed the analytical part that outlined many economic positives, but was intrigued by some behavioural references. Even though some of the CEA’s remarks were restricted to officialdom, they prompt me to think about the distinguished role business leaders and industry chambers must play in the emerging scenario.

Below par

Paraphrasing what the CEA described as a global phenomenon. “.. experts often hold back objective assessment. Instead they censor themselves and in public are insufficiently critical, nor independent of officialdom. Further, to the extent they offer criticism it is watered down to the point of being unidentifiable as criticism”. Yet “.. there are notable Indians who are consistent exceptions to this critique. What strikes me is how few these exceptions are, and how infrequently the experts are willing to engage in public debate about the macro-economy”.

“ .. this is serious since high-quality policymaking demands high-quality inputs and debates”.

In the emergent environment, conventional wisdom is being challenged or stood on its head in so many areas — always intended to be for the larger good. Could it be appropriate for business leaders (on their own or as part of collective industry bodies) to re-evaluate their roles and value additions? Why did the CEA feel that inputs and debates are sub-optimal in quality and occurrence ?

An ethos of advocacy

The Ficcis, CIIs, and PHDs of this world and their global ilk, all have analogous purposes: to be a collective voice of advocacy, and represent/protect the economic well-being of business and professional communities, thereby contributing meaningfully to national progress. Evolving and maturing in tune with a dynamic or disruptive policy environment in a constructive, practical yet forthright manner is central to their mission.

The ethos of our business forefathers (which included stalwarts such as Purshotamdas Thakurdas, JRD Tata, GD Birla, Shri Ram and Kasturbhai Lalbhai) led them to create the legendary Bombay Plan pre-Independence. It elicited both praise and disapproval.

For that time in history, the plan was fraught with complexities including the possibility of being found “politically incorrect” whether by the exiting or incoming government. However, even under this setting the objective of the authors was to “merely put forward a basis for the objectives of economic planning in India and to stimulate discussion and criticism”.

Numerous commentators later wrote that, though the plan was unfortunately relegated, ‘it is no exaggeration that it occupied something of a mythic position with scarcely a study of postwar Indian economic history that does not point to it as an indicator of developmental and nationalistic aspirations of the domestic capitalist class’. These aspirations, by the way, are still germane.

The central point is that such expression reflected a non-partisan approach and articulation on the part of the business community, in the larger interest of the nation. If and how to accept it or modify it was a matter for the national leadership to address.

What’s demanded

Rational, responsible, constructive and spirited opinions that are the hallmark of the business community need to manifest themselves even today as a response to the challenges. The nation’s development agenda, one that the Government has committed itself to, requires this.

The trust of civil society, as well as proponents of control within the Government, may also align better with the true needs of the economy and smooth functioning of the business sector. I am sure we all realise that trust in a constituency quickly wanes if it is perceived to be self-centred or a closed club where infractions can be ignored or blamed on someone else.

People through history have readily turned to creating generic groups that can be criticised at will and with a broad brush. For example, people did this with the political class; business is now also a punching bag. An era of declining trust poses serious challenges to those of us seeking to engage in effective discussion, decision-making and participation processes.

The convergent approach that upheld healthy links between society, government and business can and must be revived. It is often said that someone has to begin the cycle of trust by an act of faith. It’s obvious that the prime mover of the cycle must be the greater wielder of power. There’s no use waiting for the other person to make the first move.

Don’t pontificate

I feel it is also essential for all constituencies to eschew pontification or criticism, as well as self-flagellation or intimidation, to preserve positivity and promote a conducive environment.

There is a strong reciprocal relationship between individuals of reputation and organisations of reputation — each can choose to trigger assertive engagement with the ecosystem by the other. To fulfil the charter that they effectively represent and/or protect the economic well-being of business and professional communities, a comprehensive self-analysis of the responsibility of and articulation by business leaders and industry bodies is possibly merited.

For context, I also encourage reading the complete speech of the CEA, available in the public domain.

To end on a cinematic note, I paraphrase the morally upright King of Jerusalem (from Ridley Scott’s Kingdom of Heaven): “A king may move a man, but that man can also move himself. Even though those who presume to move you be men of power, when you stand before God you cannot say ‘I was commanded to do thus’ or ‘Virtue was not convenient at the time’. This will not suffice.”

This column explores ideas and opinions on Indian enterprise and economy. The writer is an entrepreneur and former president of Ficci. The views are personal

Published on May 15, 2017

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.