India Economy

Who will regulate the discoms?

VENKATARAMAN RAJARAMAN | Updated on January 10, 2018 Published on September 24, 2017

PO25_grid

PO25_grid2

Venkataraman_Rajaraman_mv

Stronger penalty clauses will prevent discoms from reneging on commitments

The use of solar power to generate electricity is rapidly gaining in prominence, not only in India but in other developing and developed regions as well. At this stage, it is very important that in India, the regulators, developers and stakeholders, including the Central and State governments and the load dispatch centres, deal with solar projects with great care so as to protect the interests of the projects and the investors.

Investor interest is burgeoning in this space and, in the broader interests of the capital market and the sector, regulators must, if required, make a separate case to facilitate these projects to access the capital market. Thermal power (including coal and gas) offers lessons on how not to deal with such investments, and this may be a guiding factor in dealing with investments in solar power projects.

If the Centre’s solar capacity addition plans (100 GW by 2022) work the way they should, the debt required may, at a conservative estimate, add up to around ₹50,000-75,000 crore over the next two to three years. This is a whopping number for a fledgling sector, especially at a time when the banks are sceptical about the overall power scenario and, therefore, hesitant to lend further.

This will place a burden on the debt issuance market, which may demand a considerable premium in pricing. Just the sheer volume of investment demand needs a disciplined behaviour and track record by all the stake holders concerned, mainly the revenue counterparty — the State discoms.

Two major risks

Construction risks are considered minimal in these projects. Besides other supply-related and operating issues, two major risks continue to haunt the sector.

One, general uncertainty in the minds of lenders about the performance of the newly manufactured panels that lack a track record and, second, and more important: counterparty uncertainty.

The second risk is more serious but avoidable. This is whether the discoms can stick to their contractual commitment to the power purchase agreement (PPA) on scheduling and evacuation of power, as well as their uncertain payment track record.

Practical experience suggests that these risks are more overwhelming than the supply and operating risks of the project. Contrary to public perception, solar PPAs are not ‘take-or-pay’ contracts, nor based on declaration of available capacity. They are just paid based on the energy evacuated.

Power must be scheduled without any grid curtailment. If the State discoms use grid-curtailment as a tool to bring in cost efficiencies, higher tariff solar power will obviously be crowded out. But that is against the spirit of the renewables sector’s ‘must-run’ status and the commitment to cut dependence on fossil fuels. Unfortunately, this commitment does not run deep with the counterparties.

Impact on solar projects

The mixed signals sent out by some of the State discoms in renegotiating or cancelling higher cost PPAs appears, prima facie, to be an efficient option for the discoms; however, it gives capital market investors a big jolt and leaves them guessing whether investments in these instruments will sustain. This could hit potential issuances of solar projects — in terms of pricing and investor interest, domestic and international. Delays in power purchase payment, coupled with these signals, will hurt investor sentiment.

Ironically, the solar energy component bills (even at higher tariffs), compared to their total energy bill, are not significant enough to create such a panic in the market.

Penal interest

Given these concerns, discoms cannot claim they are not a part of the capital market any more. If a company suffers impact from banks or investors due to non-payment of debt or interest owing to contractual breaches by discoms; the State discoms will have to be held accountable.

A stereotyped penal interest clause for delayed payments may have to be revisited to include suitable modifications. Grid curtailment could be prevented by including clauses that penalise the State discoms.

(With inputs from Divya Charen, Senior Analyst, Infrastructure Ratings.)

The writer is Senior Director and Head, Infrastructure and Project Finance, India Ratings

Published on September 24, 2017

A letter from the Editor


Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.