Sunil: My health insurance brochure mentions a co-pay of 5 per cent, which would lower the premium amount by 10 per cent. I am not convinced of the cost-benefit. Can you weigh in on this whole co-pay clause?
Vijayan: A co-pay is an arrangement where the policyholder meets a certain part of the treatment cost, typically between 5 and 20 per cent, after which the insurer will clear the remaining bill. Suppose you get admitted for a procedure costing ₹50,000. After you co-pay ₹2,500 (5 per cent) to the hospital, your insurer will clear the remaining bill of ₹47,500. In return you get a discount on premiums as you mentioned.
Sunil: Seems more like a way to put your skin in the game by the insurer.
Vijayan: Yes, for one, risk sharing is an important tool in risk management. By shouldering a portion of the cost, the policyholder is sharing the risk with the insurer. Second, the insurers believe it will lower the number of false claims. Third, there may be a propensity to avoid unnecessary procedures when your financial contribution is not zero.
Sunil: But my grandfather was also asked to pay a certain amount in his policy. I am not sure if he opted for a co-pay clause.
Vijayan: Yes, co-pay can be optional in some policies which then offer a discount on premium. In others, even without discount, co-pay clause may be included as a standard. This will apply to specific medical procedures undertaken by elderly policyholders. It will be mentioned boldly in the policy documents, even as other ages will not have any co-pay limitation.
Sunil: Where else can we find such co-pay clause kicking in automatically?
Vijayan: Policy bought in Tier-II/III zone but medical care taken from Tier-I/II zone. Cost-wise, policies sold in Tier-I/II/III will be in descending order, proportional to the medical costs in those zones. So a policyholder buying in a numerically higher zone (II or III) and getting admitted in lower zone (I or II) will have to bear a certain portion of the medical cost as co-pay. Also, some group health policies may have a co-pay clause as well.
Sunil: Got it. My takeaway from this is co-pay should be avoided if possible.
Vijayan: Yes. Insurance is meant to hedge unknown risks. Sharing a portion of unknown risk for a small discount seems inefficient from a cost perspective.
Comments
COMMENT NOW
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.