Environment Ministry to pass final order in Lavasa case in 3 weeks

PTI Updated - March 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM.

The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) today informed the Bombay High Court that it would pass its final order in the Lavasa case within three weeks.

“The Ministry has accepted the recommendations along with the pre-conditions given by the Experts Appraisal Committee formed to look into the matter. A final order would be passed by three weeks,” the Additional Solicitor-General, Mr Darius Khambata, appearing for the Union Ministry told the court.

Lavasa Corporation, a subsidiary of Hindustan Construction Company (HCC), had challenged in HC, the November 25 notice issued by MoEF directing stay on construction for not obtaining mandatory environment clearances before starting the project in 2004.

Senior counsel Mr Shekhar Naphade, appearing for Lavasa argued that as per a circular issued by the MoEF in another matter, if the Ministry does not pass its final order within 45 days of the Experts Committee giving its clearance then the committee’s report is deemed to be final decision.

“It has been 45 days since the Experts’ Appraisal Committee submitted its report giving Lavasa clearance and the Ministry has not yet passed its final order,” Mr Naphade said.

Mr Khambata, however, opposed this saying the committee has not given unconditional clearance to Lavasa. “The committee has only given its recommendations along with 34 conditions out of which five are pre-conditions which Lavasa has to comply with first,” he said.

The Division Bench of Justices Ms Ranjana Desai and Mr R.G. Ketkar has directed MoEF to file its affidavit in reply to Lavasa’s argument by September 23.

The pre-conditions set by the Committee include Maharashtra Government to initiate credible action against Lavasa for violations under the Environment (Protection) Act, submission by Lavasa in the form of a formal resolution that violations would not be repeated and intensity of development shall be as per Hill Station Regulations and there would be a clear demarcation of no development zone.

Published on September 5, 2011 10:28