The judgment in the December 16 gang-rape case involving a minor has been again deferred till August 31 by the Juvenile Justice Board.
The board, presided over by Principal Magistrate Geetanjali Goel, today postponed the verdict on the ground that the Supreme Court is to pronounce its order on maintainability of a PIL seeking fresh interpretation of the term ‘juvenile’ in the statute.
The police, after attending today’s proceedings, told the media outside the Juvenile Justice Board that the verdict has been deferred till August 31 as the apex court has reserved its order on the maintainability of the PIL.
This is the fourth time that the pronouncement of verdict has been deferred by the board since July 11.
The Supreme Court had on August 14 reserved it order on the maintainability of a PIL filed by former MP Subramanian Swamy for a fresh interpretation of the term ‘juvenile’.
Referring to a provision of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, Swamy had said that it was “badly” drafted and needs to be revisited as it was in violation of the United Nations Convention for the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and Beijing Rules on the issue.
He had said that the “mental and intellectual maturity” of minor offenders be considered instead of the age limit of 18 years while fixing their culpability.
Swamy had also cited the alleged role of the juvenile in the December 16 gang-rape case.
The juvenile was one of six persons who had allegedly gang-raped a 23-year-old girl in a moving bus here. The victim died in a Singapore hospital on December 29.