Comments
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd will infringe on the patent of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals blockbuster drug Lunesta.
Dr Reddy's shares were trading down 0.69 per cent at Rs 2,439.00 on the BSE in morning trade.
Setting aside an earlier ruling given by a New Jersey Court, the federal Circuit Court said that the lower court has “erred” in granting summary judgment of non-infringement by Dr Reddy’s (DRL).
Lunesta (eszopiclone) is the prescription brand to treat insomnia.
According to Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Lunesta generated $136 million revenues in North America and Chinese markets in the April—June quarter of the current fiscal.
Sunovin is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd (DSP).
“In view of the foregoing, we conclude that the district court’s construction of the asserted claims was correct, but we also conclude that the court erred in granting summary judgment of non-infringement to Reddy.
“Therefore, because Reddy’s ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application) specification infringes claim 1 of Sunovion’s ’673 patent as a matter of law, the judgment of the district court is reversed,” the court said in its order.
Sunovion, formerly known as Sepracor Inc., filed its infringement suit in March 2009, targeting 10 generics makers including Dr Reddy’s that had filed ANDAs for their own versions of Lunesta.
In January, the New Jersey federal judge observed that Dr Reddy’s didn’t infringe the patent of the drug belonging to Sunovion, finding that the Indian drug maker’s proposed generic version of the sleep aid is chemically different.
Sunovion argued that the District Court erred in concluding that DRL would not infringe by making and selling its product approved by the FDA.
According to the federal court judgment copy, Dr Reddy’s original ANDA specification, submitted to the FDA on December 15, 2008, requested regulatory approval for generic eszopiclone products with some specifications.
However, the regulator on June 24, 2010, communicated to the company deficiencies in its ANDA specification and alter DRL submitted an amendment to the FDA on April 26, 2012, revising its ANDA specification to request approval for the generic products.
Comments
COMMENT NOW
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.