Govt strategies on onion unworkable

Tejinder Narang | Updated on November 25, 2017 Published on July 24, 2014


Imports will lead to price rise globally; export curbs can result in shady deals

The inter-ministerial suggestions for import of over one lakh tonnes of onions and the decision to hike minimum export price (MEP) to $500 a tonne f.o.b to curb shipments are not the panacea for cooling the surging vegetable’s price. It is easy to say “we can import” but the nitty-gritty of process of import may not be workable beyond a few thousand tonnes.

Since the Government may subsidise imports, private trade will stay aloof from taking any initiative. Thus PSUs may be fronted with mandate to subsidise by 50 per cent, or in simple terms, will be asked to sell at a huge loss.


According to Government guidelines, PSUs must undertake due diligence before initiating any commercial operation. No PSU has a registered/pre- qualified list of performing parties who can efficiently deliver onions within short span of 45-60 days. Though the country of origin too remains unidentified, one can surmise that origin could be predominantly Pakistan. China could be another source but logistics will be difficult to handle.

Dealing directly with little known and never tried Pakistani or Chinese sellers may not be commercially viable. The option then devolves upon Dubai or Singapore or UK-/EU-based traders who become intermediaries in import transactions at extra cost. Government tenders require 21 day notice period for submission of bids. Business can be finalised with the lowest bidder. Finalising with next low bidders may require special dispensation from vigilance. Imports from China can take place only in “reefer containers” or refrigerated containers — which do not ply on India-China route. Their availability too is scarce. These are procedural issues.

Then there are some other concerns on bidding, pricing and implementation. Assuming a tender for import of 25,000 tonnes is notified, bids received may not be for more than 500-1,000 tonnes from each bidder. The reason is simple: Indian demand will spike prices of onion in Pakistan or China. Foreign sellers will like to limit their risk exposure. Against a single tender, contracting of not more 2,000-3,000 tonnes may be feasible and that too if procurement guidelines are relaxed.

A simple search on the Internet reveals prices of Pakistani onions vary between $400 and $700 f.o.b, depending upon quality. Should c.i.f cost of imported onion be say $500/tonnes at Indian ports or ₹30,000/tonne, then cost at mandi may be minimum ₹36,000 or ₹36/kg after accounting for 20 per cent as storage, financing, internal movement, shortages, rotting, etc. At 50 per cent subsidy, the wholesale price will be ₹18/kg which involves subsidy of ₹180 crore for one lakh tonnes. Has this subsidy been approved? Only then, the retail price can be ₹20-22 a kg.

If frequent bidding is called for, local prices in Pakistan will be hyper inflationary, escalating to say about ₹50-60 a kg or $1,000/tonne or more. These developments will compel Pakistan to ban its exports. All concluded contracts will be frozen under force majeure. Neither any arrival of onion nor any claim can be realised.

MEP and Ban

Minimum export price facilitates shady deals. Parties to the deal may be situated in India and UAE who may be sister companies or such associates companies who conduct trade with prior understanding. Excess payment can be transferred through grey or illicit channels to the buyers for ensuring remittance to Indian exporter or black/unaccounted funds stashed abroad can be formalised through banking channels. It is inconceivable as to why Governments knowingly or unknowingly become complicit in such questionable transactions.

Putting blanket prohibition on Indian onion export may be helpful for downward pressure on onion prices. But it will inflate prices of other origins like Pakistan. If import is an option then banning export will be counterproductive.

Since Governments are seldom logical and rational, but more political—they continue to ignore market dynamics and pursue interventionist policies of hitting at the middlemen, subsidization – buying at high prices and selling below market prices – banning exports etc without any result. Onion problem is seasonal. Soaring prices have to be tackled by the market. Policymakers can never capture millions of options under which a market operates.

Sharad Pawar rightly commented in October 2013 – “Government does not control onions and does not sell onions. Prices are determined by the market.” His thought process can be a gentle reminder.

The writer is a trade analyst

Published on July 24, 2014

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.