G Parthasarathy

Realism must mark India’s ties with US

G Parthasarathy | Updated on September 19, 2018

New Delhi has to manage a tricky balancing act of maintaining good ties with Iran and Russia as well as keeping US happy

While public attention was focused on the highly publicised “2+2 Dialogue,” between the Foreign and Defence Ministers of India and the US, two interesting developments took place in India’s relations with China. The first was a remarkably warm meeting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with visiting Chinese Defence Minister General Wei Fenghe on August 21.

Modi appreciated that differences between the two countries were being handled with “sensitivity and maturity”, which was evident from the prevailing peace along the China-India borders. He also welcomed the growing cooperation between the two countries, including in areas of defence and military exchanges.

Unlike its earlier behaviour, which resulted in three million people being stranded and 130 killed in floods in Assam last year, China provided India information on the rising levels of the Brahmaputra, this year, well in advance. This enabled India to deal with the flood situation effectively. It would, however, be naïve to infer that these developments signal any change in China’s efforts to undermine India’s influence across its Indian Ocean neighbourhood, or moderate its economic, diplomatic and military support for Pakistan and terrorist groups like the Jaish-e-Mohammed. But, it does indicate that after the Modi-Xi Jinping Summit in Wuhan last year, China would not like tensions like those witnessed in Doklam last year, to arise again, in the near future.

These developments give India more diplomatic space to deal with Trump’s US, which has offended friends and foes alike. The Trump administration has unilaterally renounced many past American bilateral, regional and global commitments, with its “America First” policies. It is an administration that has offended and dealt arbitrarily, even with long-term allies like Canada, Germany and Japan.

India needs to be totally realistic in dealing with the Trump Administration. Even before commencing discussions with New Delhi, the Trump Administration filed a complaint against India in the World Trade Organization (WTO), challenging several of our export programmes. Ironically, this move came at a time, when the US had levied heavy duties on India’s exports of steel and aluminium.

Afghan dilemma

The Americans are indicating a desire for an early, face-saving exit from Afghanistan. The Afghan Armed Forces will, hopefully, continue to be armed, equipped and financed to meet challenges posed by the Pakistan-backed Taliban. A far more active engagement by India, with parties that respect the Afghan Constitution in Afghanistan, is imperative, so that the Afghans can ensure that Pakistan does not lead the Americans up the garden path, with promises of good behaviour, by the Taliban.

Russia and China, for different reasons, now have a cosy relationship with the Taliban. They evidently hope that the Taliban will join them in taking on the Islamic State. Neither the Russians nor the Chinese, however, have a past record of understanding Afghanistan and its people objectively. China will also inevitably face the consequences of its brutal suppression of its Muslim population in Xinjiang, bordering Afghanistan.

Military cooperation between India and the US received a boost during the Pompeo-Mattis visit, with the establishment of formal links between India’s Western Naval Command and the American Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain. Maritime cooperation with this Fleet would be very helpful, in events affecting the safety and security of over six million Indians, living in the Gulf Region.

Moreover, the Communications and Security Agreement signed during the recent talks, would give India access to valuable intelligence information that Americans could provide. The US and India have shared concerns about growing Chinese assertiveness across the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans. These include Beijing seeking the establishment of a “string or pearls” across sea-lanes, from Kyaukpyu in Myanmar, to Djibouti. India, the US and Japan have been carrying out tripartite naval exercises. These exercises should now be extended across India’s west coast.

Recent US Legislation, popularly alluded to as CAATSA, enables the US government to impose sanctions on countries, which have “significant transactions” with Russian arms industries. These sanctions would adversely affect all banks having dollar transactions, which virtually all major Indian banks have.

After strong lobbying by India, the Trump administration got the legislation amended to enable it to exempt countries like India, Indonesia and Vietnam from its provisions.

Iran factor

India has also been affected by recent sanctions imposed by the Trump Administration on oil purchases from Iran, which has become a major supplier of oil, after the Obama Administration revoked UN sanctions. With the reintroduction of sanctions on Iran by the Trump Administration, New Delhi would have to get a sanctions waiver from President Trump, for oil imports from Iran, after November.

China escapes the effect of these sanctions, because it has largely balanced trade with Iran and Russia and no dollar transfers are required. India has trade deficits and cannot arrange payments through bilateral settlement mechanisms, with either Russia or Iran. These are the two most crucial issues, affecting India-US relations presently. But, what is interesting is that not a word was uttered officially about these crucial issues, by either side, after the recent “2+2 Dialogue,” in South Block.

The American move imposing sanctions on purchases of Russian arms are obviously, as motivated by a desire to promote its own arms sales, as by geopolitical considerations, to pressurise Russia. India will lose face internationally if it backs off from getting crucial S 400 air defence missiles from Russia, for which negotiations have been completed.

India could consider devising measures to modify its arms relationship with Russia, to one linked to its “Make in India” programme. It should examine how this can be done for indigenous production of Russian items like Automatic Rifles, or submarines. Payments will, of course, be made easier, if the Russians import more from India, by resorting to rupee trade, like the Soviet Union did.

While the US sanctions are not likely to be applied for India’s Chahbahar Port project in Iran, New Delhi will inevitably have to progressively reduce oil imports from Iran, after persuading the US to not oppose dollar payments, for a specified time, beyond November.

In a longer-term perspective, international cooperation has to be sought, if the US is to be prevented from acting in the arrogant and arbitrary manner as it is doing currently. Even US allies like Germany, which could face US sanctions for gas imports from Russia, may not be averse to considering such actions, for ending the dominance of the US dollar, in international transactions.

The writer is former High Commissioner to Pakistan

Published on September 19, 2018

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor