India is the world’s largest producer of fruits and vegetables, has the largest area under wheat, rice and cotton and is the second-largest producer of rice and wheat. That is the good news. But, at the other end of the spectrum, India loses about Rs 50,000 crore annually just on account of frail post-harvest infrastructure.
A major scoop of these farm losses can be traced to a feeble supply chain system that includes storage, transportation and distribution. Inadequate warehouses and cold storages and poor road and rail transportation are some of the red flags in the Indian logistics landscape.
Different studies have indicated that the logistics industry in India is valued at about 13-14 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP), while in developed nations, especially in the US, it ranges between seven to eight per cent of their GDPs. This is a clear indication that Indian consumers are forced to pay avoidable costs for more logistics expenses and post-harvest losses.
Infrastructure development
The Government’s initiative to allow 51 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail has been a subject for debate for quite some time now. The Government appears to be confident of drumming up enough support to counter the opposition’s move to block it in the ensuing winter session of Parliament that begins next week. A minimum investment of $100 million and a mandatory 50 per cent capital reinvestment in back-end operations have been proposed.
Experts indicate that this could beef up the existing logistics infrastructure to a significant extent, which could translate into better prices for farmers and consumers. However, there is one rider. Retailers feel that unless there is a seamless implementation of this programme across states, a robust supply chain architecture cannot be built. If some states chose not to open up FDI in their retail sectors, there would be a break in the chain.
Organised food retailing in India still accounts for less than two per cent of the total food market, according to a recent study by Nabard. Estimates indicate that the size of this segment is Rs 19,400 crore, as against the total food market of Rs 12,45,000 crore. By 2020, this segment is estimated to grow to Rs 62,000 crore, the study points out. Indeed, direct procurement by retailers in the new format is seen to deliver better deals, both for the farmers and producers, especially due to improvements in supply chain operations.
In a paper presented during a recent Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) seminar, Sunitha Raju from the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, points out that direct procurement format resulted in an increase in farmers’ net income by eight per cent, while consumers paid six per cent less and transportation wastage fell by seven per cent. This could further improve if supply chain logistics is strengthened.
Warehousing issues
Inadequate warehousing is one of the biggest bottlenecks in the entire supply chain structure. Statistics show that at 108 million tonnes (MT), the present agriculture warehousing capacity is short of the requirement by about 25 MT. A major portion of this is with Food Corporation of India (32 MT), Central Warehousing Corporation (10 MT) and State Warehousing Corporation (21.30 MT). The fact that the Government needs to further incentivise this sector to attract private players is indicated by the fact that in the last ten years hardly 35 million tonnes capacity has been created by the private sector.
In this context, the Andhra Pradesh Government has taken an initiative to bring out a separate agri-warehousing policy. “The new policy is part of the State Government’s initiative to have an additional 50 lakh million tonnes of warehousing capacity in the next three to four years through public-private participation. We expect to finalise it in the next one or two months,” I.Y.R Krishna Rao, Special Chief Secretary (Agriculture Marketing), said.
CII estimates that the shortfall in warehousing capacity for the next five years is expected to be about 40 million tonnes at current rate of production. However, the Government is targeting to create about 35 million tonnes of new capacity in the next five years, involving an investment of Rs 14,390 crore. The shortfall is even more acute for cold storage facilities. There are an estimated 5,400 cold storages with a total capacity of about 25 million tonnes. Nearly 80 per cent of this is used for potatoes. Further, these are available in only nine per cent of the markets. It is estimated that to expand cold chain facilities to handle 40 per cent of the food and vegetables in the next five to six years would require an investment of a whopping Rs 55,000 crore.
Higher costs & wastage
Another bottleneck is that the quality of warehousing operations is poor, leading to more costs and wastages. A study by Delloite puts warehousing costs at 20-25 per cent of the total logistics costs,while 80 per cent of the warehouses are traditional with sizes of less than 10,000 sq ft. Apart from the farm sector, the Indian life sciences segment too is smarting under inadequate logistics backing, especially in regard to reefer transportation.
A study by Deutsche Post DHL and the Organisation of Pharmaceutical Producers of India last year had revealed that the time taken for a hypothetical one-way trip covering 300 km in India was between 24 to 36 hours. But the same in China would take less than 18 hours and in EU between 8 to 10 hours. While trucks in India log an average of 200 kms a day, those in China and Japan cover 600 kms and 800 kms, respectively. Thus, while the FDI in retail is expected to see some more debate in the ensuing Parliament session, its positive impact on supply chain logistics cannot be ignored.
Keywords: farm losses, post-harvest infrastructure, Food Corporation of India, Central Warehousing Corporation, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, Confederation of Indian Industries, foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, cold storage facilities



Comments:
Could this help in eliminating adulteration which is rampant in most of
the products? Other concern is the fake products. There are lot of
duplicate products in the market especially in the cosmetics, baby food
items.
The real & biggest danger of allowing FDI in retail is the economic
invasion of India by China through these foreign Retailers.
Stores like WalMart & Tesco get more than 70% of their revenue from
non agricultural products and most of these products are imported from
China where these giant retailers have manufacturing units or are
manufactured under contract in China.
The biggest beneficiary of opening up of FDI in retail in India will
be China as its (China's) industries will get unlimited access to one
of the worlds' biggest retail market (India). Even today when the
Chinese products are sparingly available in the markets have caused
many industries to shut down. With these big foreign retailers coming
to India providing cheap Chinese stuff will nearly wipe out our local
industries.
Who stops the government from creating cold chains like in China.
Give Indians some time before GOI allows foreigners to enter its
market.
Experiences of other countries show that the establishment of supermarkets by Walmart and others has led to excessive use of pesticides, insecticides, fertilisers and other chemicals in the production, preservation and storage of food products. Such stores have their own standards according to which they buy the products (manufactured and agricultural). If a product does not pass through that standard test, it will be dumped back on the farmers, and because of the monopsony market, the farmer does not have any other place to sell it. Thus the farmer always tries to produce products that are uniform and standard. This needs huge amount of pesticides and leads to loss of the numerous indigenous varieties of crops. Under such circumstances, the large format local corporate as well as foreign retail shops/stores (run by the multinational retail giants of United States as well as Europe) are unsuitable for the welfare of the people of the country.
When one analyzes the US supply chain from the producer to the consumer, there are more sectors than the retail sector that play vital roles. For example, other sectors, not retail sector, deal with cold storage and transportation. For the sake of objectivity in informing the public, Indian writers should study North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) descriptions and data published by the US Bureau of Census as they write these articles.
Please Email the Editor