Between bread and empire

Parvati Sharma | Updated on May 08, 2020 Published on May 08, 2020

Palace intrigue: Jahangir pictured in a court setting. His “chain of justice” was made of 120 kilos of gold and stretched for 25 metres

Throughout history, governance and justice have often taken divergent paths

Jahangir, the fourth Mughal emperor and Akbar’s overlooked son, is often painted in broad strokes. There is his love for the legendary courtesan Anarkali, for example, his indulgence in drink, his ‘chain of justice’. The last was not legendary, though it was certainly lavish — 120 kilos of gold strung with 60 golden bells, hanging 25 metres from a tower in the Agra fort to the banks of the Yamuna below. Anyone with a grievance might, in theory, pull the chain to attract the emperor’s attention.

It isn’t clear whether anyone ever dared ring for Jahangir in this way, although there are many anecdotes of the emperor dispensing justice. Much of this is punitive: For example, an official who charged a tax that Jahangir had abolished was paraded through the streets with his head shaved; a courtier who broke a favourite plate of the emperor’s was sent off to China to find a replacement. There is also a case of what one might call a law-and-order situation that Jahangir relates himself in his autobiography, the Jahangirnama.

It happened in Burhanpur, the Mughals’ Deccan headquarters, while the emperor was far to the north, on his way to Kashmir. The brother of one Sayyid Kabir Barha had given his sword to be polished; when he went to pick it up, he got into an argument with the polisher about his fee, at which the Sayyid’s men decided to resolve the matter with sticks. It so happened that the polisher’s shop was near the house of one Raja Gridhr, a Rajput and, like the Sayyid, a nobleman of the empire. The Raja’s men took the polisher’s side; soon enough, it was swords, not sticks, that had come into play, and three men were dead. At this point, Sayyid Kabir and Raja Gridhr entered the fray themselves, and the latter was killed, with 26 of his men.

The matter was spiralling out of control, Rajputs and Sayyids had gathered for a full-scale battle, when Mahabat Khan — Jahangir’s senior-most commander at the time — rushed to the scene. Khan separated the two groups of warriors, tried to soothe the Rajputs, went to Gridhr’s house and commiserated with his sons. He eventually arrested Barha and had him executed — “since the Rajputs would not be appeased by anything other than having him killed”.

It was a crisis narrowly averted. As is clear from the dizzying escalation of their dispute — a polisher’s fee that ended in a bloodbath — neither the Sayyids nor the Rajputs were of meditative temperament. The Sayyids of Barha, hailing from Muzaffarnagar, had been staunch allies of the Mughals since Akbar’s time (one highly placed nobleman described them as the “bulwark of the empire”), and they had been resolute in their support for Jahangir when court politics almost snatched his succession from him, days before Akbar’s demise. The Rajputs, meanwhile, were intimately intertwined with Jahangir’s dynasty — his own mother was the first Rajput princess that Akbar married. Any perception of injustice by either side could have caused deep fractures in the empire; Jahangir’s narration implies that Khan had forestalled “a major rebellion”.

I remembered this story while reading the historian Richard M Eaton’s new book India in the Persianate Age, which he begins with an analysis of how the idea of the ‘Sultan’ took shape across the Persianate world. In the 10th and 11th centuries, with “the steady decline of the Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad”, coupled with the “infiltration of waves of Turkish-speakers from eastern Asia into... Central Asia and northern Iran”, there occurred a split between religious and temporal power.

Religious authority still rested with the Caliph; but the various sultans who gave him their spiritual allegiance were ruling kingdoms where the imperatives of managing increasingly diverse populations held greater sway than religious authority. (Jahangir, in the 17th century, ruled not only Sayyids and Rajputs, but a whole plethora of creeds and races). Thus, Eaton continues, “long before Renaissance or Enlightenment thinkers in Europe”, scholars in Iran and Central Asia were propounding the separation of church and state.

A 12th-century Persian historian, Ibn Balkhi, for example, proposed this succinctly secular tenet for temporal kingship: “There is no kingdom without an army, no army without wealth, no wealth without material prosperity, and no material prosperity without justice.”

The idea caught on, not only in Persianate rule as it began to extend into the Indian subcontinent, but beyond it too. Eaton notes a striking similarity between Ibn Balkhi’s prescription and a bit of advice by a Telugu court poet, Baddena, writing in the 12th or 13th century: “To acquire wealth: Make the people prosper; To make people prosper: Justice is the means. O Kirti Narayana! They say that justice is the treasury of kings”.

Centuries later, another poet, Bertolt Brecht, would write, “As daily bread is necessary / So is daily justice” — but this poet of the people turned the idea of its dispensation on its head. Justice would no longer be doled out by kings. “The bread of justice must be baked / By the people,” wrote Brecht. “Plentiful, wholesome, daily.”

Parvati Sharma   -  BLink


Parvati Sharma is a Delhi-based writer and the author, most recently, of Jahangir: An Intimate Portrait of A Great Mughal

Published on May 08, 2020

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.