Opinion

Ending poverty and hunger in our lifetime

Laurent Thomas | Updated on January 24, 2018 Published on July 19, 2015

bl19_poverty.jpg

It can be done, but it must be accompanied by investment in agriculture and rural development world over



The Third International Conference on Financing for Development in Addis Ababa last week was a rare opportunity for high-level representatives from governments, civil society and the private sector to reflect on and debate the future architecture of development financing. The timing of the conference was particularly important, coming just months before the next UN General Assembly, when member nations are expected to endorse an ambitious new package of sustainable development goals to be achieved by 2030.

Prior to the conference, the FAO together with the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD) and the World Food Programme (WFP) estimated the cost of eradicating hunger at approximately $267 billion of additional resources each year until 2030.

The bigger cost

Despite the seemingly high cost, the reality is that the cost of inaction is far higher — some estimates put the annual cost of malnutrition to the global economy at several trillion dollars. Global annual military expenditure is an estimated $1.8 trillion, while within the OECD almost $260 billion is spent every year on agricultural support in member countries. Put another way, $267 billion corresponds to just 0.3 per cent of world economic output. Is this really too high a price to pay to help almost 800 million hungry people?

Sustainably eradicating hunger through pro-poor investment, particularly in agriculture and in rural areas, makes good economic sense. Various studies have demonstrated that there is no other sector in which the returns on investment in terms of poverty alleviation and employment are more effective.

Over 70 per cent of the poor live in rural areas and derive their livelihoods from agriculture, livestock, forestry or fisheries. A significant proportion of the poor are under- or unemployed youth, particularly in developing countries. Simply closing the gender gap in agriculture would reduce the number of hungry people by 12 to 17 per cent.

Ensuring women have better access to land, inputs and training would mean that between 100 and 140 million people are no longer hungry. $47 billion should be allocated to the financing of social protection programmes, that is, transfer of money to those who live on less than $1.25 a day (poverty line defined by the UN). Simultaneously, investing $80 billion to the poorest will enable them to generate their own income and become independent. The majority of funding must be directed to rural areas.

Achievable goals

We believe that eradicating hunger is possible. Food systems and agriculture can be a source of wealth and well-being for all, especially the poorest. And this can be achieved during our lifetime. We can be the “Zero Hunger generation”.

Eradicating hunger requires that we build on successful local and international experiences. The starting point is breaking the cycle of poverty, hunger and low productivity in agriculture. The road ahead demands prudent investment in social protection to ensure the poor can access sufficient, nutritious food to facilitate the eradication of hunger even before 2030. At the same time, investment in agriculture and rural development is critical to ensure the eradication of hunger is sustainable.

With an additional annual investment of $116 billion in social protection plus $151 billion in productive investments ($105 billion of which should be in agriculture and rural areas), the world will be sustainably free of hunger. This translates to an annual investment of approximately $160 per hungry person — the cost of a mobile phone or a sheep. The wealthier part of the world can easily afford this.

As the old adage goes, “A hungry man is an angry man”. Eradicating hunger is not only cost-effective, it is also a vital investment in peace, security and sustainable development. A failure to make these additional investments will ultimately result in much higher costs for the global economy.

Zero hunger in the world is a global public good. And this is what the participants at the Addis Ababa conference wish to communicate. Let history remember us as the “Zero Hunger generation”.

The writer is the assistant director-general at FAO for international technical cooperation

Published on July 19, 2015

A letter from the Editor


Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.