Money & Banking

For RRBs, first uniform NPA norms then corrective action: Officers’ federation

K Ram Kumar | | Updated on: Apr 10, 2018
image caption

Hasty implementation of 'PCA' without addressing standardised NPA norms is risky, says AIRRBOF General Secretary

 

 

The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) should implement the prompt corrective action framework for Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) only after ensuring that they follow standardised non-performing asset norms, according to the All India RRB Officers’ Federation.

Shyamal K Bhattacharjee, General Secretary, AIRRBOF, cautioned: “There is no standardisation in following regulatory guidelines among RRBs. Adoption of PCA in RRBs at this moment will have disastrous consequences on them.

“Any hasty implementation without addressing the issue of standardisation will be fraught with inherent risk – the risk of faulty determination of the financial health of individual RRBs.”

Nabard has come up with a PCA framework to enable RRBs that fail to meet prudential requirements relating to capital adequacy, net non-performing assets (NNPAs) and return on assets (ROA) to take self-corrective action so that further deterioration in their financial position is prevented and they are nursed back to health.

Three parameters

PCA for RRBs will be invoked once they breach trigger points on three parameters – capital to risk-weighted assets (CRAR) ratio, assets (NPAs) and profitability (ROA). The PCA framework will be implemented based on the findings of Nabard’s inspection with reference to RRBs’ FY2019 financial performance. RRBs were established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, to ensure sufficient institutional credit for the rural and agriculture sector. They are jointly owned by the government of India and the concerned State government and sponsor banks, with the issued capital shared in the proportion of 50 per cent, 15 per cent and 35 pe r cent, respectively. Nabard is the supervisor of RRBs. Bhattacharjee observed that NPA norms are being interpreted and implemented differently in RRBs due to a lack of elucidation of the applicable norms.

The same norms are implemented flexibly in one RRB, but stringently implemented in another RRB, producing widely different results, he added.

He elaborated: “The practise of classifying a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) loan as NPA also is widely different in different RRBs. As a huge chunk of the total advance of an RRB is KCC advance, this practice leads to RRBs getting projected in poor light owing to high NPA volume because of erroneous classification of KCC as NPA.”

The federation wants freedom to amortise provisions against loss on investments over four quarters just as commercial banks have been allowed, and lower risk weight on Kisan Credit Card and Self-Help Group loans, which are priority programmes of the government.

Bhattacharjee said that under the garb of financial stability, strengthening of the capital base and ensuring minimum capital adequacy ratio, RRBs have been weakened. He underscored that regardless of the yeoman service rendered by the RRBs, stringent financial yardsticks have been imposed on them.

Published on April 10, 2018

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

COMMENTS
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

You May Also Like

Recommended for you