Sennheiser Momentum Wireless 3: Sound, silence, sophistication
The new generation of these popular headphones amp up the sound and improve noise cancellation plus a few new ...
The applicability of transfer pricing provisions was earlier limited to cross-border transactions. The Supreme Court in the case of Glaxo Smithkline Asia made some important observations, especially on the need for a robust tax mechanism to address pricing between group companies. Subsequently, Finance Act 2012 extended transfer pricing provisions to specified domestic transactions (SDT) with effect from April 1, 2013.
Now, transactions between domestic group entities or persons should be reported/ documented and benchmarked accordingly.
However, taxpayers should follow the compliance procedures under SDT only if the aggregate value crosses Rs 5 crore in a financial year. To determine this threshold, all transactions with specified domestic related parties on the expenditure side should be taken into account. However, if the taxpayer or taxpayer’s unit(s) is enjoying certain tax benefits then, apart from expenditure, income should also be counted.
According to regulations, taxpayers should maintain documentation for SDT, including benchmarking relevant transactions by selecting the appropriate method and undertaking functional and economic analysis. Taxpayers should capture the SDT in Form No. 3CEB, to be filed with tax returns. Comprehensive documentation is needed to both justify the pricing during assessment and for mitigating the risk of penalty if tax authorities do not accept the price.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes has notified the new Form No. 3CEB to assist the taxpayer in reporting and filing SDT as well as international transactions. Taxpayers should provide details such as name, address, PAN (Permanent Account Number) of the related party, description of transactions along with the amount and methodology used to benchmark the SDT in the new Form No. 3CEB.
Taxpayers with SDT will get additional time — they have to file the tax return and Form No. 3CEB by November 30, instead of September 30. Moreover, revenue authorities too will get additional time to complete the assessments involving SDT. Non-compliance with the requirements could attract penalties ranging from 2 per cent to 4 per cent of the SDT value, besides leading to double taxation within the group.
As the arm’s length price concept for SDT transactions has now been defined, there will be clarity on the transaction rate/ price; earlier, under Section 40A(2) the test for excessive or unreasonable expenditure was quite subjective. The onus earlier was on tax authorities to prove that the transaction was not at a correct price, which now has been shifted to the taxpayer.
By applying transfer pricing provisions to SDT, tax authorities will also check the possible shift of profits from high-tax entities/ units to low- or zero-tax entities/ units in SEZ (special economic zones), infrastructure companies and so on. There will also be a check on shifting profits from a profit-making entity to one with accumulated losses to reduce the combined tax obligation for the group.
Compliance burden would increase for taxpayers in terms of documentation, filing of Form No. 3CEB, pricing, scrutiny assessment and so on. On the other hand, determination of the arm’s length nature will be more structured. The Tax Department will also need to deploy additional skilled resources to understand and assess entities with SDT.
Any new law will initially not be completely clear to the taxpayer, The Government should provide clear guidance on the application of transfer pricing to SDT, including how to interpret terms such as “close connection”, how to report transactions without consideration, how to benchmark transactions such as directors’ remuneration or sitting fees, and so on. Given the ongoing litigation over transfer pricing for international transactions, taxpayers should be careful when benchmarking and preparing documentation for transactions such as transfer of capital assets, common cost apportionments, managerial remunerations, inter-unit transfers and discounts or transactions under the cash pooling system.
Guidance would be welcome on whether co-relative adjustment would be allowed where transfer pricing adjustment is made to a group company, and whether advance pricing agreements would cover SDT.
After the introduction of transfer pricing regulations for SDT, the burden of proof for justifying the price has been shifted to the taxpayer where there is payment to related parties. Compliance burden has increased, especially for business groups with multiple entities and a variety of inter-company transactions. As the deadline for filing tax return for FY 2012-13 is fast approaching, it is time to pay attention to the compliance exercise. A proactive, rather than reactive approach is called for.
Pramod Joshi is Senior Director and Ashish Apte is Manager, Deloitte Haskins & Sells
The new generation of these popular headphones amp up the sound and improve noise cancellation plus a few new ...
CreditAccess Grameen, a Bengaluru-based microfinance company, has signed an agreement to buy ...
This is how the new Snapdragon processors is going to change the smartphone market
Analysts see advantages but also caution about prickly issues, including traffic sharing
The stock of leading telecom service provider Bharti Airtel rallied last week, thanks to the implementation ...
For investors in Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), the September quarter results were a bit of a dampener.
Regular investments, emergency reserves, adequate insurance and plugging gaps can do the trick
The stock of Apollo Tyres tumbled 4.4 per cent with good volume on Tuesday, breaching its 21-day moving ...
The World Health Organization estimates that depression and anxiety — among the more prominent mental health ...
A documentary on The Savoy is reaping awards at international festivals
A Bengaluru entrepreneur revives a traditional cotton weave with a sheen that can beat silk
A new volume of essays examines the multidimensional impact of climate change on India, and why development ...
Kerala wants to be India’s creative hub where designers ideate, imagine and innovate for tomorrow
How Fujifilm has used its imaging strength to re-invent itself
Tech interventions are speeding a brand’s journey to the store
Storytelling meets consumer insights over a cup of coffee
With land and State resources in short supply, only higher education can challenge social hierarchies, says ...
Fee hike can hit students of low-income groups
The fees for the flagship Post Graduate Programme (PGP) in Management at the Indian Institute of ...
Farmers, reeling under crop losses, feel the Centre’s crop insurance scheme is merely helping insurance firms ...
Please Email the Editor