Editorial

Recapitalising PSBs is not a good idea

| Updated on October 30, 2020 Published on October 30, 2020

Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Finance Minister   -  BusinessLine

In the last three years, the Centre has already infused ₹3.5-lakh crore into PSBs with very little to show for it

In her extensive interview to this newspaper on Thursday, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman was clear that the Centre will not infuse any further equity into public sector banks (PSBs), and that market-based fund-raising and higher retail ownership is the way forward. This is welcome given that Covid-related business disruptions are widely expected to escalate capital requirements for PSBs. While their actual capital needs will depend on many moving parts, estimates by rating agencies suggest that PSBs may require new capital of anywhere between ₹35,000 crore and ₹85,000 crore in the second half of this fiscal, to maintain their capital buffers. Funding this will certainly stretch the fisc at a time when the priority is resuscitating the economy. But weaning PSBs away from their government dependence is desirable for other reasons as well.

In the last three years, the Centre has already infused ₹3.5-lakh crore into PSBs with very little to show for it. While each round of capital infusion is made with the intent of improving credit flow to the economy, in practice, the bulk of capital tends to be absorbed by bad loan provisions, while bankers continue to display endemic risk aversion. Attempts to make these infusions selective and contingent on individual PSBs’ performance have not worked either, as tottering banks need to be shored up before eroding depositor confidence can pose systemic risks. This devil-and-deep-sea situation results in a moral hazard where the government is forced to commit indiscriminate amounts of taxpayer money towards PSB recapitalisation every year with very little payback. While there can be no doubt that the government cutting its apron strings in PSBs is the best way forward, getting public shareholders to subscribe to these offers will be no mean task.

After sluggish credit growth and loan losses in the recent past, even leading PSBs boast of poor profitability and return ratios that compare unfavourably to private sector peers, with their stock prices languishing well below book value. Infusing fresh capital at these bargain-basement valuations, apart from diluting earnings for existing investors can actively deter new ones. Kicking off long-pending governance reforms can partly solve this problem by shoring up market valuations and investor sentiment towards PSBs. Creating an umbrella holding company to house government stakes in all PSBs, distancing the government from commercial decisions by appointing independent boards and CEOs, extending top management tenure and ushering in performance-linked pay at PSBs are just a few of the reform measures suggested by the PJ Nayak committee, which can be implemented forthwith.

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

Published on October 30, 2020
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor