Personal Finance

Blended fees factor in risk-adjusted performance

B Venkatesh | Updated on April 16, 2011 Published on April 16, 2011

The fee structure has to serve the purpose of the investor and the fund.

Investors typically believe that asset-based fee is not fair and that performance-based fee is optimal. But a blended model that is fair to the firms and the investors is possible.

There has been a continual debate on how to optimally structure asset management fees. Mutual funds currently adopt asset-based fees, which is not always fair to the investors. The question is: What is the fee model that is fair to the investors and the firms?

This article explains the issues relating to asset-based and performance-based fees. It then shows how firms can develop a blended model that is fair to the investors as well.

At first glance, it is obvious that asset-based fee is not optimal for investors. The firm receives its fees as percentage of assets under management (AUM) even if it underperforms the benchmark index (negative alpha). Besides, there is no direct incentive to generate higher returns, prompting firms to “chase” asset size to generate revenue.

Consider a fund whose alpha strategies are not unique. A non-unique alpha strategy would mean that the fund is primarily generating excess returns through exposure to high beta stocks. This causes inconsistency in excess returns, as market timing plays an important role in performance. Such funds typically increase revenue by gathering large AUM through strong marketing network.

Performance-based fee, on the other hand, appears to align the interest of the investors with that of the firms.

There are, however, some issues that merit attention. One, performance-based fee model requires a meaningful benchmark that captures the underlying investment process. Two, the firm has to have a good performance measurement system that captures the alpha and the resultant performance fees.

And even if firms have best-practice performance measurement systems in place, the investor is confronted with the need to identify a fund that generates sustainable alpha.

This is no different from the present situation of asset-based model where all firms charge similar fees, forcing the investor to search for funds that generate consistent returns.

What, then, is the way ahead?

Blended fees

A blend of asset-based and performance-based fees could help moderate the problem by aligning investor interest with that of the asset management firms. Some form of this structure is already practiced by hedge funds.

To start with, firms should have a low asset-based fee, say 100 basis points. We believe that each fund should define its mandate in a measurable way to reward sustainable performance.

Suppose a fund follows large-cap style. The mandate could be to, say, generate excess returns of one per cent with a tracking error of not more than 2 per cent. In effect, the mandate requires the fund to have an Information Ratio (Excess returns divided by Tracking Error) of 0.50 or more.

Such a model could moderate the problem of a having an inappropriate benchmark, as it adjusts for the associated risks through the Tracking Error.

The model can define a participation rate of, say, 20 per cent of the excess returns over the benchmark if the fund generates the mandated Information Ratio (IR); higher IR would proportionately increase the performance fees while lower IR would decrease the fees. And to ensure consistent performance, the model can require the fund to achieve the mandate in, say, rolling three-year periods.


The blended-fee model appears to be fair to the firms and the investors. Importantly, firms adopting such a model signal confidence in their alpha strategies.

Besides, firms would be hard-pressed to look at their alpha fading rate — the rate at which alpha converges with the market returns or beta. This could prompt them to continually explore newer strategies and not offer same products as their peers. Such a scenario would augur well for the investors in the long run.

Of course, the larger issue still remains — if all firms eventually adopt the blended model, investors will still have to identify funds that can generate sustainable alpha.

(The author is the founder of Navera Consulting, a firm that offers wealth-mapping and investor-learning solutions. He can be reached at >

Published on April 16, 2011

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!


Support Quality Journalism
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.