SEARCH

‘Intention clear on launching guar complex futures next season'

Suresh P. Iyengar
Share  ·   Comment (4)   ·   print   ·  
Mr R. Ramaseshan
Mr R. Ramaseshan

Commodity markets regulator Forward Markets Commission banned futures trading in guarseed and guar gum on Wednesday. The contribution of both these contracts to the daily turnover of the National Commodities and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX) has come down from 25-30 per cent to 10-15 per cent in the last two months.

Levy of high margin has hit trading interest in guar contracts. However, the exchange has maintained its daily turnover of Rs 6,000 to Rs 7,000 crore due to renewed interest in other commodities and rising prices. Though the exchange maintains that the suspension of guar contracts cannot be termed as a ban, the trading community begs to differ. They contend that the regulator has not given a definitive date by when it will be re-launched.

Mr R. Ramaseshan, Managing Director of NCDEX, spoke to Business Line on various issues plaguing futures trading. Excerpts from the interview:

Is the ban on guar futures justified?

The recent regulatory action to close out the contracts in guarseed and guar gum does not amount to a ban. Only the current season contracts have been closed out due to physical market conditions. It is clear that the intention is to launch the contracts for the next season.

With the imposition of high margin on the long side, strict regulatory measures, reduction in position limits, suspension of August and September 2012 expiry futures contracts, trading volumes and open interest in the futures contracts traded on the exchange dropped substantially.

With the reported shortage of guarseed arrivals/availability in the physical markets, mandi prices continued to rise further without showing any signs of softening. Futures contracts were seen merely following the spot prices. In these circumstances, it was felt that consequentially the trading in futures contracts was not serving the desired purpose of price discovery and it was, therefore, decided to close out the running contracts in guarseed and guar gum.

Are we back to the ban syndrome?

No. I do not think so.

There was a demand in the Rajya Sabha to ban futures trading in commodities. What is your view?

We do not think that banning futures trading in commodities is a correct step. It is necessary to view the rise in prices in commodities along with the underlying demand supply scenario, physical market functioning and prices and more particularly in respect of guarseed and guar gum, demand for exports and international prices of the commodity, it being primarily a export-oriented industrial product. Agricultural commodities being sensitive in nature, we may see such demands now and then. However, the impression about futures trading and inflation has undergone a sea change now, especially with several reports pointing out clearly to the fact that futures trading by itself does not lead to inflation.

The price behaviour of commodities which were delisted/banned earlier, clearly show that even after the delisting/ban, prices have gone up. We see several policy makers coming around to the idea that futures trading is required for transparent price discovery and risk management, and also should be used as a tool for planning policy initiatives.

Do you think putting a price cap on guar would have helped?

It should be understood that the guarseed and guar gum contracts are ‘compulsory delivery' contracts and are, therefore, anchored to the underlying physical market. Prices are determined by forces of demand and supply, including production, import/export, substitution effect, international prices if available, etc. Futures market has to be seen in conjunction with the spot market. A cap on futures prices of guarseed and guar gum would not have served any purpose. This is evident by the fact that the physical market prices have remained at high levels despite the restrictions on futures trading and close out of the running contracts.

A few traders ask if the rising price in guar is a crime? If the FMC is going to ban all volatile commodities, what is the need for an exchange, they wonder. What is your comment?

The FMC has not fixed a price band. Trading in physical market is still going on at whatever prices the spot market determines.

After waiting for seven years, is it time to deepen commodity markets by allowing institutions such as banks and FIIS?

We believe that this is the right time to allow banks and domestic institutional investors to trade in agriculture futures as this will contribute significantly to widening and deepening the market besides ensuring entry of more number of professional players.

Suresh@thehindu.co.in

(This article was published on March 29, 2012)
XThese are links to The Hindu Business Line suggested by Outbrain, which may or may not be relevant to the other content on this page. You can read Outbrain's privacy and cookie policy here.

Comments:

Indian farmers are always deprived of the profits they deserve first .

Unless they are protected, they wo'nt survive. Isn't it a treachery with them that they had to sell guarseed at a miserably low price.

The future will tell us consequences. How long we can keep innocent youth waiting a naukri ( job )? Ultimately it is in our national interest to attract masses towards agriculture side . To do so it is imperative to safeguard farmer's interest by imposing law .

from:  Randheer singh
Posted on: Mar 29, 2012 at 21:45 IST

The regulation of the commodity derivatives market leaves much to be desired, particularly after the regular Chairman of the Forward Markets Commission relinquished his charge. The incumbent holding the charge as Acting Chairman has hardly any clue about economics of any commodity traded on the Exchanges. The organisation is also starved of officers having commodity domain after a few stalwards left the organisation on transfer or promotion. If futures trading was not responsible for the abnormal price volatility, then why was trading in Guarseed and guar gum banned or suspended without any sunset clause? Also, why the prices dropped sharply after the ban/suspension? Ramseshan and his batchmate Chairman, Forward Markets Commission Ramesh Abhishek - notwithstanding the obvious conflict of interest - owes an explanation to the country which is facing commodity inflation resulting in refusal by RBI to reduce Repo rates, which in turn has resulted in prolonged slow down of economy.

from:  Thiripal Raju
Posted on: Mar 30, 2012 at 09:54 IST

Some fundamental facts: Guar gum is a versatile product having like
oil drilling, mining, explosives, paper, textile, ore flotation, food
and other various industrial applications. Guar gum powder has got an
increased usage in oil drilling industry in last couple of years. Data
by APEDA state that export of Guar Gum and other guar derivatives for
the period April-Nov 2011-12 stood at 6.7 lakh MT compared to 2.28
same period last year. The underlying strength of demand for guar gum
is from the continued activity of hydraulic fracturing in the USA.
most significant use of guar and its derivatives has been in petroleum
production. Fundamentally driven Price rise in guar is benefitting all
the genuine stakeholders:Farmers are the foremost beneficiaries, as
their hard work in the fields is fetching them good returns.They are
motivated to grow more of the crop in coming years. millers are
getting good crush argins.State,Central Govt are benefiting due to
higher recovery of taxes and forex.

from:  Siddharth Surana
Posted on: Apr 6, 2012 at 19:16 IST

If the trading in the commodity is so beneficial to the producers, millers and other "genuine" stakeholders, why was the commodity delisted in first place? If the raw material cost jumps by 1000%, as was the case this season, would the millers be the beneficiary? Do the farmers of India have waiting capacity to avail benefit for the price-rise which happens long after the the harvesting period is over? Do we accept hyper-excessive speculation, as evident from the daily trading in virtual or paper-contracts in guar-seed to the extent of the entire
annual guar-seed crop, as benign or even beneficial to the economy and
the stakeholders of the commodity? These are the questions which need
to answered clearly.

from:  Vinay Shah
Posted on: Jul 5, 2012 at 13:21 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

DATA BANK

Exchange Rate

Dollar Spot Forward Rate

Open-Ended Mutual Funds

MCX-SX Currency Futures

NSE Currency Futures


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in Industry

Wipro gets BSE, NSE approval to merge subsidiaries with itself

Leading stock exchanges BSE and NSE have approved the merger of Wipro with two subsidiaries as the amalgamation does not violate securit... »

Comments to: web.businessline@thehindu.co.in. Copyright © 2014, The Hindu Business Line.