Comments
None of the 21 public sector banks in the country can claim to feature a representative of officers or employees on its board any more.
This is because the last of the latter’s tribe have ended their terms and stepped out of the boards on September 18, RTI enquiries reveal.
‘Laws demand it’
As per Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970, Sec 9 (e), ‘one director from among the employees of the corresponding new bank who are workmen under clause (6) of Sec 2 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to be nominated by the Central Government in such manner as may be specified in the scheme made under this section.’
Sec 9(f) says that ‘one director from among employees of the corresponding new bank who are not workmen under clause (s) of section 2 of Industrial Disputes Act 1947 to be nominated by the Central Government after consultation with the Reserve Bank.’
A similar provision has been made in the SBI Act under Section 19 (ca) and (cb), says DT Franco, general secretary, All India Bank Officers’ Confederation (AIBOC).
Practice stopped with
According to him, the practice of appointments seem to have been stopped though recommendations have been sent by banks to the government as per the procedure laid down in the scheme.
By September 18, 2017 the term of the last employee directors on the boards of Bank of Baroda and Dena Bank had ended.This has been one of the contentious issues highlighted in the strikes and agitations conducted by the United Forum of Bank Unions.
It is unfortunate that the government which talks about transparency should have rendered opaque the bank boards which take crucial decisions, Franco said
‘Feigns ignorance’
“When we met the Finance Minister on September 15, he responded in a manner as if he was unaware. He merely directed us to Rajiv Kumar, Secretary, Department of Financial Services.
“We appraised Kumar about the position. But so far nothing has moved since the decisions have to be taken by the Appointments Committee,” Franco said.
The Reserve Bank has chosen to be silent in the matter, it seems. Nor has the Securities and Exchange Board of India has not taken any steps.
AIBOC demanded that the government proceed to immediately ‘fulfill the obligation and clear files pending with it for years now.’
Comments
COMMENT NOW
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.