Lashing out at media reports hinting at “bias” on the part of members of an expert committee constituted by the Supreme Court to intercede between protesting farmers and the government, Chief Justice of India Sharad A Bobde said it has become “almost a cultural thing” to brand people.
“They (committee members) are brilliant minds in the field of agriculture... Branding of people whom you do not want, this has become almost like a cultural thing. You malign people’s reputation and then you say the court is interested in these people... I am sorry that this kind of opinions are appearing in the Press,” Bobde fumed.
Social media and articles in newspapers had criticised the court’s choice of members on the expert committee constituted on January 12.
Now, Centre offers to put 3 farm laws on hold for 2 yearsFarmers say will discuss and revert by Friday noon
The opinions published had pointed out that the members had previously written in favour of the farm laws. Write-ups indicated the members may not be empathetic to the cause of the farmers, who have been protesting on Delhi’s outskirts for over 50 days, demanding repeal of the laws. Amid this, one of the committee members, Bhupinder Singh Mann, had recused himself from the committee.
“You unthinkingly cast aspersions on people. Bhupinder Singh Mann had even asked for modifications of the laws, can you say he is in favour of the laws... Or is it that you do not want people to have opinions? Even the best judges have opinions, though he can give a judgment against his own personal opinions... Have you not found in the body-politic people expressing an opinion and changing them once informed?” asked the Chief Justice of some lawyers appearing for farmers.
The court said the reputations of the members have been torn to shreds. The committee has been given no power to decide on the farm laws. They have been constituted only to hear out the farmers.
‘No power to adjudicate’
“We formed the committee only to hear the farmers’ grievances and submit a report to the court. They were given no adjudicatory powers. So, where is the question of bias here? If you don’t want to appear before the committee, don’t. But why cast aspersions on the court and brand people. We did not want to intervene, but we did only for the sake of the common people and the farmers,” Chief Justice of India Bobde said.
Chief Justice Bobde said newspaper reports do not decide disputes in court.
“We are adjudicating the dispute. Are we going to read newspapers and decide disputes? Public opinions cannot be used to determine court proceedings,” CJI said.
Senior advocate Harish Salve, for a petitioner supporting the farm laws, said the court should record the fact that the expert committee has no adjudicatory powers. He said he would seek contempt action if anything appears maligning the court or the committee members in future despite the court’s order. The Bench recorded the brief given to the committee in its order, especially that it does not have any adjudicatory power.
The court also decided to examine a plea made by Kisan Maha Panchayat, a farmers’ body from Rajasthan, to fill the vacancy left by Mann on the committee.
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.