Free market and the reel world

N Madhavan | Updated on May 07, 2020 Published on May 07, 2020

Theatre owners need not fear OTT platforms and resort to protectionism. They can continue to be relevant even as tech disrupts

Covid-19 has been brutal in exposing many a fault lines across sectors. It has not spared the film industry either. When speculation started that Akshay Kumar’s next film Laxxmi Bomb could well première on an OTT platform in view of the coronavirus-led disruption, all hell broke loose.

Many film exhibitors were appalled. “You releasing your film directly on OTT will justify the medium and make theatres irrelevant,” one of them said in an open letter to the actor. Down south, the `sacrilege’ actually happened. The production house of a small-budget Tamil film Pon Magal Vandhal went ahead and signed a deal with Amazon Prime for its release bypassing a theatrical release.

Members of Tamil Nadu Theatres and Multiplex Association could not believe their eyes. They were so agitated that they went to the extent of warning actor Suriya, who owns the production house, that none of his future films will see theatrical release if he went ahead with the deal.

There is no visibility on when the lockdown will be lifted, when theatres — even if the restrictions are eased — will be allowed to function and whether people, scarred by coronavirus, will ever flock to the cinema halls like before for a while. Under the circumstances, a producer who has sunk a lot of money in a film is well within his rights to explore options to redeem his investment.

OTT platform is an obvious solution. Clearly, theatre operators went overboard in their reaction. To claim that theatres exist for films and the producers (excepting those films specifically produced for OTT platforms) have no right to bypass theatrical release is against every free market principle. This is true even when there is no lockdown and theatres are up and running. Technological disruptions will happen from time to time and history has shown that fighting it through protectionism is a sure shot recipe for disaster.

In this case the reactions were excessive. It stems more from fear of the unknown. No one really knows if OTT platforms are really a threat to cinema halls. The practice in India (also across the world) is what the industry calls ‘delayed window’ of release.

A film first has a theatrical release followed by OTT platform after about eight weeks (this window is shortening, of late) and then on television. So OTT platforms have never been tested so far with a big ticket release. And the numbers are stacked against them.

Revenue flow

According to the recent FICCI-EY report on ‘Media & Entertainment Sector’, the Indian film industry in 2019 saw a revenue of ₹19,100 crore. The total digital rights paid by OTT platforms that year was ₹1,900 crore. Similarly, 100 million people visited theatres, at least once, to watch a film in 2019 (total footfall 1.46 billion). In comparison, total OTT subscriber base in India stood at around 10 million. In spite of OTT platforms doubling their subscriber base in 2019, theatres witnessed their best ever revenues.

Multiple factors contributed to this. Box office collection typically accounts for 74 per cent of a film’s revenue (balance comes from digital, TV and music rights). This is particularly true for blockbuster movies involving top stars. A successful ₹200 crore Salman Khan or a Rajinikanth film will garner as much as ₹150 crore or more from theatrical collection alone.

OTT platforms cannot pay such large sums of money to premier blockbuster films. Their business model of constantly increasing their subscriber base works better by releasing many low/medium-budget movies to engage its audience rather than spending a lot for just one big film. Exhibitors know that a producer can never ignore them and hence they chose to threaten the producers.

They should ideally be happy that producers are releasing low/medium budget films in the OTT platforms. During most times, there is a huge backlog of films awaiting release and blockbuster films crowd out other movies causing pain to producers.

This is because India’s screen density per million population is just seven compared to China’s 36 and US/Canada’s 111. In 2019, there were only 9,527 screens across the country (down from 9,601 in 2018) and as many as 1,941 films were released (almost 37 a week). One blockbuster movie releases across 4,000-6,000 screens or even more (Baahubali-2/2.0). That leaves very little space for other films.

Offer better value

It is time theatre and multiplex players understand that OTT platforms are growing their subscriber base rapidly because they are offering value to their customers in the form of power of choice, content diversity, seamless accessibility and, above all, absolute convenience. This cannot be wished away.

Rather than arm-twisting the producers by adopting market-distorting policies, they should look at offering their customers a value proposition that compels them to visit the theatres to watch movies.

This can be done by investing in state-of-the-art projection and sound systems, larger screens, augmented/virtual reality technologies and offer the same at a value that is affordable. Once they offer such a deal, people will have nowhere to go but to a cinema hall to enjoy a film, especially blockbuster or large budget movies.

If so, a few smaller films going to the OTT platforms will not worry the exhibitors. Such films, it has been established, actually do well in Amazon Prime or Netflix by recording much higher views than footfalls in theatres. In fact, they will be happy because, it has been established that OTT platforms, by endearing people to films, eventually drive up footfalls into theatres. It is a positive correlation.

So, theatre and multiplex associations should give up their protectionist attitude and allow market forces to play. A producer should have the freedom to choose the platform to screen his film. If the theatres continue to offer a strong value proposition as they are doing today, they should be least worried. Predatory behaviour affords protection only up to a point and has, in the past, pretty much ensured that incumbents are, in the end, consigned to history in the wake of technological disruptions.

Published on May 07, 2020

A letter from the Editor

Dear Readers,

The coronavirus crisis has changed the world completely in the last few months. All of us have been locked into our homes, economic activity has come to a near standstill. Everyone has been impacted.

Including your favourite business and financial newspaper. Our printing and distribution chains have been severely disrupted across the country, leaving readers without access to newspapers. Newspaper delivery agents have also been unable to service their customers because of multiple restrictions.

In these difficult times, we, at BusinessLine have been working continuously every day so that you are informed about all the developments – whether on the pandemic, on policy responses, or the impact on the world of business and finance. Our team has been working round the clock to keep track of developments so that you – the reader – gets accurate information and actionable insights so that you can protect your jobs, businesses, finances and investments.

We are trying our best to ensure the newspaper reaches your hands every day. We have also ensured that even if your paper is not delivered, you can access BusinessLine in the e-paper format – just as it appears in print. Our website and apps too, are updated every minute, so that you can access the information you want anywhere, anytime.

But all this comes at a heavy cost. As you are aware, the lockdowns have wiped out almost all our entire revenue stream. Sustaining our quality journalism has become extremely challenging. That we have managed so far is thanks to your support. I thank all our subscribers – print and digital – for your support.

I appeal to all or readers to help us navigate these challenging times and help sustain one of the truly independent and credible voices in the world of Indian journalism. Doing so is easy. You can help us enormously simply by subscribing to our digital or e-paper editions. We offer several affordable subscription plans for our website, which includes Portfolio, our investment advisory section that offers rich investment advice from our highly qualified, in-house Research Bureau, the only such team in the Indian newspaper industry.

A little help from you can make a huge difference to the cause of quality journalism!

Support Quality Journalism
  1. Comments will be moderated by The Hindu Business Line editorial team.
  2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be published.
  3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters, or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text. (example: u cannot substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
  4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
  5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles for this week. For full access, please subscribe and get unlimited access to all sections.