The Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 seeks to discriminate between willing and unwilling farmers and is, hence, inconsistent with the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Tatas’ counsel, Mr Samaraditya Pal, argued before the Calcutta High Court on Monday.
“There is no such concept of willing and unwilling farmers in the Central Act. The Land Acquisition Act does not provide for such a discrimination,” Mr Pal argued.
According to the senior counsel, the Singur Act suffers from a “two-fold vice” and was formulated keeping in mind the concept of “willing and unwilling farmers”.
“A law cannot override the Constitution,” Mr Pal said referring to the Singur Act.
“This (the Singur Act) is arbitrary and cannot be justified by giving a legal framework,” he added.
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.