When a supervisor is hauled up after 23 years for his alleged laxity in supervising construction, examined by an enquiry officer without witness and called upon to cough up about Rs 3.70 lakh in sixty instalments, it amounts to a grave injustice to such employee inasmuch as he would not be having in his possession any evidence to plead his innocence. The Madras High Court in Tamil Nadu Housing Board vs. R. Chakrapani therefore had no hesitation in holding the action of the housing board unsustainable in law. Long interval between the alleged act of negligence and initiation of action by itself is sufficient to quash such proceedings. What compounded the illegality of the employer in this case was his brazenness in framing charges without so much as a single witness who the employee concerned could have cross examined. Besides, no employee can be expected to keep in his possession documents and other proofs for 23 long years on the paranoid belief that some day he could be hauled over the coals.
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.