Money & Banking

‘Govt may have to redo recapitalisation math as banks await MTM losses’

PTI Mumbai | Updated on January 08, 2018

Surging bond yields to cause ₹15000-cr market-to-market losses; PSBs to be hit harder: ICRA report

Continuing surge in the benchmark bond yields, which rose as much as 67 bps in Q3, will leave banks with a big hole in their treasury portfolios and result in mark-to-market (MTM) losses of ₹15,500 crore for the December quarter alone, warns a report.

As much as 80 per cent of the over ₹15,000-crore dent are slated to be absorbed by State-run lenders, further eroding their core capital, and government may have to rework its recapitalisation math because of it.

Private banks better poised

In the H1 of FY18, State-run banks had a pre-tax loss of ₹5,624 crore and 80 per cent of the projected loss of ₹15,000 crore will be borne by them, says an ICRA report.

In contrast, private sector players are relatively better placed to absorb the MTM losses with pre-tax profit of ₹30,994 crore during the same period.

Banks had booked a whopping ₹1 trillion profit between the six quarters ending Q2 of FY18 following a steady decline in bond yields after RBI cut interest rates.

Concerns over higher fiscal deficit for FY18, wherein government has used 112 per cent of fiscal deficit target by November itself, has had the bond yields on fire for quite some time. This had the average Q3 yields at 7.33 per cent and peaked at 7.4 per cent in the last week of December.

“The 67 bps surge in yields on the 10-year government security in Q3 on the back of higher-than-budgeted fiscal deficit, is likely to result in MTM losses to banks on their investment portfolios in Q3 to the tune of ₹15,000 crore for the system,” ICRA said in note.

According to the agency, this is because banks have much lower cushion to absorb interest rate shocks, following the recent surge in bond yields available for sale portion of their G-Secs portfolio, the report said.

As of Q2, public sector banks had a larger share of the Available for Sale (AFS) book with longer duration compared to their private sector peers. Accordingly, they are likely to account for 80 per cent of overall MTM losses of ₹15,000 crore, he said.

It also said with this unexpected surge in yields and resultant losses, government may have to increase the capital it intends to frontload into the banks through recap bonds.

Treasury gains

It can be noted that the steady decline in bond yields had resulted in windfall profits for banks, especially in the six quarters between Q4 of FY16 and Q2 of FY18, when banks booked a whopping ₹1 trillion from treasury gain, much higher than their total pre-profit of ₹51,105 crore.

While a part of treasury gains were also due to sale of non-core assets by banks given the profitability pressures, however the same is estimated to be under ₹20,000 crore in overall treasury gains, which means that a large share of the gains is coming from their bond portfolios.

Of this ₹1-trillion treasury gains, State-run banks had booked 74 per cent of or ₹ 74,300 crore, thanks to their excess G-sec holdings. But, despite these sizeable gains, they reported pre-tax losses of ₹48,020 crore during the period.

As banks gradually booked profits on their investment portfolios, yields on their investments declined to 7 per cent in Q2 from 7.9 per cent in Q4 of FY16, reducing the cushion to absorb MTM losses against adverse interest rate movements.

Decline in 10-year G-sec yields during Q4 of TY16 and Q2 of FY18 was supported by improved fiscal conditions and yields bottomed out at 6.2 per cent in Q3 of FY17 due to the surplus liquidity from note-ban.

Bond yields were but continued to remain below 7 per cent in H1. But, with the rise in crude prices and concerns on fiscal slippages, yields started to harden from September and continued throughout the December quarter and touched 7.4 per cent in the last week of December.

Published on January 03, 2018

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

null
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

You May Also Like