Money & Banking

Why the Centre has assumed a lower dividend from the RBI for next fiscal

Radhika Merwin BL Research Bureau | Updated on February 05, 2018

comment

While lower dividend payout by the RBI had led to a shortfall in non-tax revenues in 2017-18, it appears that the Centre is once again bracing itself for RBI’s tightfistedness in the next fiscal.

For 2018-19, proceeds from dividends from the RBI, nationalised banks and financial institutions have been pegged at ₹54,817 crore, only 6 per cent higher than in the previous year.

The Centre received ₹51,623 crore in 2017-18, far lower than the budgeted ₹74,901 crore, mainly due to shortfall of nearly ₹35,000 crore in dividend from the RBI.

The RBI’s surplus transfer to the Centre had been impacted by lower income, higher expenses and a transfer of ₹13,140 crore to its contingency fund. (The RBI’s accounts impact Centre’s fiscal with a one-year lag due to cash accounting.)

What has led the Centre to keep its expectation modest for the coming fiscal too?

Continued reverse repo operations by the RBI to absorb excess liquidity and factoring in the possibility of transfer of some portion of the surplus to contingency fund appear to be the two key reasons for the Centre’s muted forecast for 2018-19.

Surplus in the system

The RBI’s 2016-17 accounts show that on the expenditure front, the cost of printing notes, which had more than doubled from the previous year due to demonetisation, had cost the RBI dear.

On the income side, the sharp fall of 23 per cent was due to interest outgo by the RBI on its liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) operations.

Banks can borrow money for the short term from the RBI under the LAF. Alternatively, banks can lend their excess funds to the RBI through reverse repo (absorption of liquidity).

Net interest on LAF operations had slipped from positive ₹506 crore in 2015-16 to a negative of ₹17,426 crore in 2016-17, due to interest outgo on reverse repo operations. This had impacted the RBI’s income.

While the net average absorption of liquidity under LAF was the highest in the months ensuing demonetisation in November 2016, it has been sizeable even after March 2017, until October 2017. Hence, the RBI’s income for 2017-18 is also likely to be impacted by the interest payout on reverse repo operations.

Average net absorption by the RBI had spiked to ₹4.4 lakh crore in March 2017.

Variable rate reverse repo auctions averaged ₹3.8 lakh crore in April and ₹3.4 lakh crore in May 2017. Net average absorption of liquidity under the LAF stood at ₹3 lakh crore in July, ₹2.22 lakh crore in September and ₹1.4 lakh crore in October.

While the numbers have been trending lower, they are still sizeable to impact the RBI’s net income on account of interest payout.

Re-building its kitty?

Aside from the dip in income, the RBI transferring ₹13,000 crore of surplus to its contingency fund in 2016-17, had also impacted the dole-out to the Centre last year.

Additions to this fund had ceased since 2013-14 and the entire surplus in the RBI’s coffers was being transferred to the Centre up until last year.

The RBI had been contributing a chunk of its profit to the contingency fund up to 2012-13; between 2010-11 and 2012-13, the RBI had set aside 32-45 per cent of its gross income to this fund.

The debate on how much the RBI should transfer to its contingency reserves has once again taken centre-stage. Contingency reserve represents the amount set aside for meeting unexpected and unforeseen contingencies, including depreciation in the value of securities, risks arising out of, among others, monetary/exchange rate policy operations, and systemic risks.

In the past, two internal working groups — V Subrahmanyam Group in 1997 and Usha Thorat Group in 2004 — had given their recommendations on how much contingency reserve is adequate.

The former suggested internal reserves (Contingency Fund and Asset Development Fund) of 12 per cent of total assets, and while the latter proposed about 18 per cent.

The RBI’s reserves were about 10-11 per cent of total assets between 2009 and 2011. It has been slipping since then and in 2015-16 and 2016-17 stood at a much lower 7.5 per cent of total assets.

If the RBI chooses to rebuild its kitty and continues to transfer funds to its reserves, it could once again impact the dividend payout to the Centre.

Published on February 05, 2018

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

You May Also Like