Comments
The Supreme Court today expressed concern over the disappearance of wetlands in the country and told the government that this was an important issue which deserved very serious attention.
A wetland is a marshy land area like swamps or mangroves that has water either permanently or seasonally and which could also have a distinct ecosystem.
Funding details sought
A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur asked the Centre to inform it about the status of funds disbursed by them to the States for preservation of wetlands and also about how these have been spent by the States.
“This issue deserves much serious attention. If there are no wetlands left, it will affect agriculture and several other things. It is a very, very important issue,” the bench, also comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta, told the counsel appearing for the Centre.
The government informed the top court that the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 have been notified and it would replace the earlier set of guidelines which came into effect in 2010.
States blamed
Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for petitioner MK Balakrishnan, said that several States have not complied with the court’s direction to inform the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change about the amounts received by them towards wetlands preservation along with the audit reports and impact of the expenditure incurred by them.
“Wetlands are vanishing in our country. This is a matter related to water conservation, which is very necessary,” he said, adding that there were around 600 lakes in Bengaluru earlier but the number has now come down to around 40.
Sankaranarayanan also raised objection to some of the provisions in the 2017 rules, following which the bench asked the petitioner to file an application in this regard.
The bench also referred to its earlier order and said that 2,01,503 wetlands in the country would continue to be protected by the government.
It asked the Atates to comply with its earlier direction within four weeks and warned that non-compliance would invite imposition of cost as well as summoning of top officials.
Comments
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.