Mobility paves Samsung’s silver path
The Korean giant’s early bet on mobile phones helped it hit the $10-bn mark in India, but in its 25th year it ...
The experience of depositors in the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank case suggests that the government and the Central bank are unwilling to protect the financial savings of ordinary households. Besides allowing depositors in the bank to access only a maximum of ₹50,000 from their savings, more than a month and half after the cooperative bank was asked to cease business because of potential insolvency, the government is ‘considering’ raising the woefully inadequate level of deposit insurance from ₹1 lakh to just ₹2 lakh.
It is to be expected that this and other similar experiences are likely to change the savings behaviour of households.
In fact, available evidence suggests that such changes are already underway. Over the six years ending 2017-18 households have significantly changed their savings behaviour. If we examine the rate of gross financial savings, which is the saving minus changes in household liabilities, we find that it has remained more or less constant in the 10.7-10.9 per cent range.
The exception was the demonetisation year 2016-17, when the shock resulted in the gross financial saving of households falling by 1.5 percentage points (Chart 1).
The gross financial savings rate bounced back to 10.9 per cent in 2017-18, the year after demonetisation. However, the net financial savings rate of households — which takes account of the liabilities of households as well — remained at 6.6 per cent in 2017-18 after having fallen from 8.1 per cent to 6.3 per cent between 2015-16 and 2016-17 (Chart 1). Clearly, the borrowing of households hit by demonetisation has increased in the wake of that shock.
But it is not just borrowing by households that rose after demonetisation, but also the way in which they allocate their financial savings. As is to be expected, since households were forced to deposit in banks the supposedly “high valued” notes that had been notified for withdrawal from circulation, the share of cash in the gross financial savings of households — which stood at 13.1 per cent in 2015-16 — fell by 22 per cent in 2017-18. At the same time, the share of deposits rose from 43.1 per cent to 67.8 per cent (Chart 2).
But the rush to deposit in banks did not last even into the subsequent year. Deposits with banks had accounted for more than 50 per cent of gross financial savings of households over 2011-12 to 2013-14 and fell to 48.7 and 43.1 per cent in 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively, before demonetisation drove it up. In 2017-18, it stood at the relatively low level of 27.1 per cent.
Households are showing a marked tendency to stay out of bank deposits. This may partly be because of falling interest rates on deposits and partly because of the fears created by evidence of large non-performing assets on the books of banks and the draft Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance (FRDI). Though the FRDI was withdrawn because of opposition, the fact that it spoke of a “bail-in” of insolvent banks in which all “stakeholders”, including depositors, were to be asked to pay a price to solve the problems of ailing banks, rather than using taxpayers’ money.
For all these reasons, households were clearly looking for safe havens for their saving, investing the surplus in government-sponsored small savings schemes and in provident and pension funds. The share of those two instruments in the gross financial savings of households, having risen from 7.9 per cent to 15.3 per cent between 2011-12 and 2014-15, settled at 23, 26.7 and 24 per cent respectively in the subsequent three years (Chart 2).
These trends are puzzling when seen in the context of the fall in the net financial savings rate of households because of an increase in their liabilities. Non-performing assets and provisioning for losses have made banks cautious, resulting in a deceleration of credit growth.
If households are also pulling their savings out of bank deposits, which is the base on which banks create credit, this trend would only be aggravated. So how are households borrowing more in the wake of demonetisation?
Advances from banks, that accounted for more than 90 per cent of household liabilities in 2011-12 and 2012-13, registered a fall in their share to 69 per cent in 2014-15. They remained more or less at that level until 2017-18 (Chart 3).
On the other hand, loans and advances from financial corporations and non-bank financial companies (NBFCs) rose from 2-3 per cent in 2011-12 and 2013-13 to 22.5 per cent in 2014-15 and then to 31.9 per cent in 2017-18.
In other words, as banks came under stress and became cautious in their lending behaviour, the slack was taken up by the NBFCs. NBFCs saw a huge increase in their loan portfolios, lending for investment in housing and purchase of automobiles and consumer durables, besides supporting real estate developers with credit to increase the supply of housing.
The capital to support this increased activity came in substantial measure from the issue of short-term instruments that had to be rolled over to sustain the capital base of these institutions.
As the trouble in banking and its ripple effects elsewhere in the financial system intensified, the ease with which loans to support the lending activity of the NBFCs could be rolled over declined, leading to the NBFC crisis, which in turn was worsened by the absence of due diligence in the boom years.
It is this combination of factors that underlies the pervasive demand squeeze and growth slowdown in the economy. Unless measures are taken to counter such a downturn by stimulating demand through state expenditure, the slowdown will only intensify and turn into a recession.
How this would further change household saving behaviour is yet to be seen. But resorting to increased borrowing from NBFCs is unlikely to continue. In such an event, net saving by households would increase, depressing consumption further and worsening the recession.
The Korean giant’s early bet on mobile phones helped it hit the $10-bn mark in India, but in its 25th year it ...
Antrix should adopt a different tactic than merely fighting over jurisdiction: Experts
Invest in relationships, enterprise, behaviour, effort and learning
From different types of osmoses to new membranes, researchers have come up with ways of drawing water
Will a stock continue its current trend or will it reverse? We tell you how you can read chart patterns to ...
₹1483 • HDFC Bank S1S2R1R2COMMENT 1465145015001510 Fresh short positions can be initiated with stop-loss at ...
Bucking the overall market trend, the stock of Capri Global Capital Limited (CGCL) gained on Monday and ...
Most AMCs have been sending out cryptic e-mails. We tell you how to read between the lines
In these isolated times when people yearn for a slice of the familiar, amateur and professional chefs are ...
On the eve of his 86th birthday, a peek into an interview-based book that reveals the actor’s many moods, ...
Forget the tuna. The island nation will keep you full and happy with coconut, koftas and jasmine
This year, on Facebook, I saw that someone had posted a list of EASY RESOLUTIONS. I didn’t copy them down but ...
Digital is becoming dominant media, but are companies and their ad agencies transforming fast enough to make a ...
Slow Network, promoted by journalist-lyricist Neelesh Misra, pushes rural products and experiences
How marketers can use the traditional exchange of festive wishes meaningfully
For Fortune, a brand celebrating its 20th anniversary, it was a rude shock to become the butt of social media ...
Three years after its inception, compliance with GST procedures remains a headache for exporters, job workers ...
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives of companies are altering the prospects for wooden toys of ...
Aequs Aerospace to create space for large-scale manufacture of toys at Koppal
And it has every reason to smile. Covid-19 has triggered a consumer shift towards branded products as ...
Please Email the Editor