Supports can limit the downside in MCX-Zinc

Gurumurthy K | Updated on October 16, 2018 Published on October 16, 2018

The near-term view is negative. A dip to test the ₹189-₹188 support region is likely in the near term.   -  VIA BLOOMBERG NEWS

Zinc futures contract on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) had tested the key resistance level at ₹205 in the past week as expected. The contract made a high of ₹204.15 per kg on October 9 and has come-off sharply from there. The contract tumbled about 5 per cent from the high and is currently trading at ₹194 per kg.

The near-term view is negative. A dip to test the ₹189-₹188 support region is likely in the near term. If the contract manages to bounce from this support zone, an upmove to ₹200 and ₹202 is likely in the short term. A strong break and a decisive close above ₹205 is needed for the contract to gain fresh momentum. Such a break will then increase the likelihood of the contract rallying to ₹210 or even ₹215.

On the other hand, if the MCX-Zinc futures contract declines below ₹188, it will come under renewed pressure. In such a scenario, there is a strong likelihood of the contract falling to ₹180 in the short term.

However, the indicators on the chart leave the bias positive. The 21-day moving average is on the verge of crossing over the 100-day moving average. This is a positive signal indicating that the downside could be limited. As such the possibility is high of the contract reversing higher from the support level of ₹188 in the coming days.

Trading strategy

Short-term traders with a high risk appetite can go long if the contract reverses higher from ₹188. Stop-loss can be placed at ₹183 for the target of ₹200. Revise the stop-loss higher to ₹191 as soon as the contract moves up to ₹195.

(Note: The recommendations are based on technical analysis and there is a risk of loss in trading).

Follow us on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and Linkedin. You can also download our Android App or IOS App.

Published on October 16, 2018
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor