Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Dec 29, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Corporate
Industry & Economy - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings
New law for supervision of holding companies proposed

RBI should be given regulatory powers: Panel.


Need for a law

At present, there is no legislation specifically permitting the regulation of financial conglomerates and holding companies.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of financial conglomerates in the country.


K.R. Srivats

New Delhi, Dec. 28 The supervision of financial conglomerates and holding companies may get a much needed boost if the recommendations of the Government-Reserve Bank of India appointed advisory panel to the Committee on Financial Sector Assessment (CFSA) are implemented.

The advisory panel has suggested the enactment of a new law on the lines of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act of the US to empower the regulator to have regulatory jurisdiction over the holding company. At present, there is no legislation specifically permitting the regulation of financial conglomerates (FC) and holding companies in India.

The panel says that the proposed legislation should be more comprehensive than the GLB and should empower the Reserve Bank of India to have regulatory reach over holding companies that do not even have a subsidiary, which is within its functional regulatory domain.

A “silo plus” regulatory approach has been suggested for holding company supervision. This term describes the supervisory structure in which supervision of each business line, usually described as functional supervision, is combined with an additional level of supervision at the holding company level.

The GLB of US authorises the Federal Reserve Board to have the supervisory oversight over financial holding companies. With financial stability being the overriding objective of a central bank, which is the only entity having lender of last resort powers in times of extraordinary market conditions and crises, the panel was of the view that the RBI should be armed with enough supervisory powers and also monitoring functions in respect of FCs.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of FCs in India. Following the intensification of links between various financial markets, a number of cross-sector organisational forms combining banks, insurance companies and investment firms have been created.

The advisory panel has noted that regulation and monitoring of the financial operations of such large complex financial organisations, described as financial conglomerates, had posed significant problems as they often create new prudential risks while exacerbating existing ones.

So far, for the purpose of supervision, 12 institutions, having significant presence in banking, insurance, NBFC, housing finance and capital markets, had already been identified as FCs.

Specifically, the advisory panel has recommended that the responsibility of regulation and supervision of the holding company should lie with the RBI in case of a FC where the apex institution is a bank holding company.

In case of a FC with a non-bank holding company (financial or non-financial) having a bank within its structure, the panel has said that the responsibility for regulation and supervision of the holding company should lie with RBI.

For a FC with non-bank financial holding company whose activity is within the regulatory jurisdiction of the RBI, the responsibility of regulation and supervision of the holding company should lie with the RBI irrespective of whether there is a bank within its structure.

In the case of a FC with non-financial holding company, the holding company should be explicitly within the regulatory outreach of RBI, to the extent that the central bank was empowered to obtain information as relevant from time to time, even if there does not exist a bank within the FC structure.

The advisory panel has also said that allowing “intermediate” holding companies may not be feasible till an appropriate regulatory structure for such an entity was in place.

More Stories on : Corporate | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings | RBI & Other Central Banks

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page




Hiring

Stories in this Section
Chill in north as Bay shows signs of warming up


Gold poised to scale higher levels next year
Kingfisher to slash fares from Jan 1
New law for supervision of holding companies proposed
Staff wages, directors’ pay move in sync with co profits
New Year bashes off, but travel agents optimistic
Ministry to speed up work on Marine Emergency Fund
Jain Irrigation Systems (Rs 347.90): Buy
Day Trading Guide
Satyam mulls dilution of promoters’ stake
Comex gold to consolidate, rise
Banking on creditable lines
Will $ be revalued?
For now, bull and bear will be driven by domestic players
Number of Net users on the rise


eWorld



The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line