Market regulator SEBI has moved the Supreme Court seeking direction to two Sahara firms to pay ₹62,602.90 crore in compliance with the court’s earlier orders, failing which the group’s chief Subrata Roy be taken into custody.
SEBI said the contemnors, Roy and his two firms ― Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Ltd (SHICL) ― are in gross violation of various orders passed by the court regarding deposit of the entire amount collected, along with interest.
Despite the top court granting relief to Roy and his firms, they have neglected and failed to comply with various orders passed by this court, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) said.
Also read: Sahara Group demands ban on Netflix series ‘Bad Boy Billionaires’
In its intervention application filed on November 18, SEBI said the “contemnors have not been complying with the orders passed by this Court despite the long rope provided to them” and their liability is increasing daily.
“The contemnors are enjoying their release from custody as granted by this court vide order dated May 6, 20l6, further extended by this Court from time to time ‘without even any attempt at compliance with the orders passed by this Court,” it said.
The market regulator said that it would be just, expedient and in the interest of justice that this court pass appropriate orders directing the Saharas to forthwith deposit the balance amount, which was ₹62,602.90 crore as on September 30 this year, in the SEBI-SAHARA refund account.
Failing this, SEBI said, “the contemnors may be directed to be taken into custody” as was directed by the top court in its verdict on June 15, 2015.
The top court on August 31, 2012, in a series of directions, had directed that SIRECL and SHICL would refund the amount collected from individual investors or group of investors, with interest of 15 per cent per annum to SEBI, from the date of receipt of the subscription amount till the date of repayment, within three months, and deposit in in a nationalised bank bearing maximum rate of interest.
The Sahara firms were also directed by the top court in 2012 to furnish the details with supporting documents to SEBI for establishing whether they had refunded any amount to the persons who had subscribed to the group’s schemes.
Also read: Former SEBI chief credits Mukherjee, Chidambaram and Jaitley for regulator's strong action against Sahara
SEBI said that as per the statements filed by the Saharas on June 14, 2012, the outstanding liability of SIRECL as on April 30, 2012 stood at ₹16,997 crore (principal amount) and the outstanding of liability of SHICL as on April 30,2012 stood at ₹6,352 crore (principal amount).
It said, in spite of the aforesaid clear directions giving clear timelines, the respondents (SIRECL and SHICL) in utter disregard, disrespect and disobedience of the directions of this court deliberately and wilfully, did not comply with any of the directions and thereby committed contempt of this court .
SEBI further stated that in terms of the 2012 order of the top court, the Sahara firms have till date deposited only ₹15,455.70 crore, which has been invested in fixed deposits of various nationalised banks, and as on September 30, 2020, the total amount along with interest earned in the SEBI-Sahara refund account stood at ₹22,589.01 crore.
It said that out of the total outstanding principal liability of ₹25,781.32 crore, SEBI has realised only ₹15,455.70 crore from Saharas and from sale of properties of the group.
The balance amount of ₹10,325.62 crore (principal amount) is still to be paid by Saharas. It is submitted that as on September 30, 2020, total net liability of Saharas was ₹,602.90 crore taking into consideration interest at 15 per cent in terms of directions of this court dated August 31, 2012, it said.
On January 24, the top court had exempted Roy and two other directors from personal appearance till “further orders” in a case related to their alleged failure in depositing over ₹25,700 crore in the SEBI-Sahara account for returning investors’ money.
The top court, on January 31 last year, had directed Roy and two other directors, Ravi Shankar Dubey and Ashok Roy Choudhary, to personally appear before it “to enable the court to pass appropriate orders so that the law can take its own course and reach the desired conclusion”.
It had said that the efforts of the Sahara group to pay back did not “inspire the confidence of the court” as its order for deposit of over ₹25,700 crore has not been complied with so far.
Roy was sent to Tihar Jail by the apex court on March 4, 2014 and came out on parole after spending over two years in prison on May 6, 2016 to perform the last rites of his mother Chhabi Roy. He has been out of prison since then.
Earlier, the apex court had noted that the Sahara group has already deposited around ₹20,000 crore in the SEBI-Sahara account, which includes ₹15,000 crore principal amount and ₹4,800 crore interest.
In July 2018, the auctioning process of Sahara group’s prized Aamby Valley properties was put off by the top court after it was informed that the auction notice did not elicit any response from prospective buyers.
Roy and two other directors were arrested for failure of the group’s two companies ― SIRECL and SHICL ― to comply with the court’s August 31, 2012 order to return ₹25,000 crore to their investors.
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.