Science

Science needs more space in mainstream media: experts

P. Ajana Mysore | Updated on August 14, 2019 Published on August 14, 2019

Science journalists and communicators have a vital role to play in connecting science with society, and in inculcating scientific temper in general public. This was emphasised by experts attending a symposium on science journalism and communication here on Tuesday.

“It is an irony that while our scientists can detect traces of methane on distant Mars, closer home we see people getting asphyxiated in manholes. It is the role of science communicators to point out such dichotomies to make decision makers so that solutions for day to day problems of people could be developed and benefits of research reach everyone,” said veteran science journalist Nagesh Hegde while inaugurating the symposium at the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI).

Science journalists and science communicators should bridge the gap between the scientists and policy makers, he said. Dr. R. Subramanian, senior scientist who presided over the inauguration pointed out the efforts by CSIR-CFTRI in the past and in the present for reaching out to lay public.

“Ahara Vijnana was the first ever specialized science magazine in any Indian language was published way back in 1955. Moving with times the Institute was now producing ThaliTales, a podcast,” he said.

The symposium was an effort to reach out to science journalists and science communicators in Karnataka, and was jointly organized by Vigyan Prasar, New Delhi and CSIR-CFTRI. Researchers, students and faculty of science and journalism took part in the discussions. Elaborating on the efforts of Vigyan Prasar to promote research of Indian scientists, Dinesh C Sharma, Managing Editor, India Science Wire, delineated the shortcomings of science journalism in India. D R Mohan Raj, a media consultant and former professor of mass communication and journalism, said that science communication is the result of a partnership between scientists, communicators and the citizen.

The use of Indian Languages is critical in partnering with the public for effective science communication. “Mere translation from English to Indian languages is not science communication,” opined Piyush Pandey, former Director, Nehru Planetarium, Mumbai who highlighted the efforts of science communication in Hindi. For T G Srinidhi of ejnana, a Kannada webzine on science and technology, the difficulty was not in the use of language or the media, but in scaling up the reach.

“Collaboration between different agencies is the need of the hour for scaling up the reachout.,” Kollegala Sharma stressed on the need to create content in Indian languages for the future when fast paced developments in technology such as artificial intelligence could create a greater digital divide.

Raviprakash, Senior Reporter, Prajavani, spoke about his experiences in accessing and editing science writings for a newspaper, while Mahinn Ali Khan, Communications Manager, National Centre for Biological Science, explained the Institute’s experience in reaching out science to general public through art and ‘Out of Lab’ interactions.

The shrinking space for science and technology in mainstream media was highlighted by panellists in the discussion on science journalism in India, chaired by Prof. Usha Rani, Media consultant and former professor, University of Mysore. S. Kumar of Tech Kannada felt that senior editors need to be sensitive for science. Amshi Prasanna Kumar said poor reportage of science was generally because journalists lacked necessary skills for science reporting. They need to visit labs like CSIR-CFTRI and understand the research process for effective and efficient reporting. Unless one understands well, communicating in regional languages will be difficult.

The symposium was attended by over 120 participants from Mysore, Bengaluru, Tumkur, Chamarajanagar and Mangalore.

(India Science Wire)

Published on August 14, 2019
  1. Comments will be moderated by The Hindu Business Line editorial team.
  2. Comments that are abusive, personal, incendiary or irrelevant cannot be published.
  3. Please write complete sentences. Do not type comments in all capital letters, or in all lower case letters, or using abbreviated text. (example: u cannot substitute for you, d is not 'the', n is not 'and').
  4. We may remove hyperlinks within comments.
  5. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name, to avoid rejection.