Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Dec 22, 2007
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Cement
Marketing - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings
Competition panel to seek cement cos’ compliance

Cartelisation charge aftermath


Cartelisation refers to attempt by firms to collude & fix prices which are artificially high.



Richa Mishra
Moumita Bakshi Chatterjee

New Delhi, Dec. 21

Cement industry majors indulging in cartelisation may find the going tough. Even as MRTPC has held the cement companies guilty of cartelisation, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided to initiate a dialogue with apex industry association to ensure their compliance with the competition law.

“In our advocacy role, we want the cement association to meet us so we can have a dialogue with them on compliance with competition law. This is to ensure that the industry is ready to meet the principles of the Competition Act, and to make them aware that non-compliance could mean trouble once the provisions of the Act are enforced,” Mr Vinod Dhall, Member and Acting Chairman, CCI, told Business Line.

Simply put, cartelisation refers to attempt by companies to collude and fix prices which are artificially high.

“It would be ideal if various industries themselves come out with a policy against cartelisation, as is followed in many developed and developing nations where they come out with voluntary norms stipulating that the players will not discuss among themselves pricing or discounts, customers and even tender bids,” he explained.

Mr Dhall’s comments assume significance in the backdrop of MRTPC holding top cement companies guilty of cartelisation under the aegis of Cement Manufacturer’s Association (CMA). Delivering the judgment in a 1990-case, the Bench issued a cease and desist order against the 41 companies and directed them “not to indulge in any arrangement directly or indirectly through the instrumentality of CMA, in fixing the prices of their produce in concert or in follow up of a concert.”

CCI, which had earlier also urged the cement association and other industry association such as shipping liners and tyre manufacturers, to discuss the competition advocacy issues, had found only two associations responding to its call. “Cement and explosives industry bodies did not come forward. CCI now is formally going to write to them,” he said.

Related Stories:
MRTPC finds 44 cement cos guilty of cartelisation
Govt allows MMTC to import cement sans BIS mark
Cement companies deny cartelisation in prices

More Stories on : Cement | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings | Economic Offences

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Clasic PNB Hiring

Stories in this Section
Idea, Spice resent DoT delay, say ‘we applied first’


‘Kingfisher has game-changing plan for overseas flights’
Competition panel to seek cement cos’ compliance
301 projects delayed, cost overrun put at Rs 48,961 cr
Indian holdings in US treasuries rise to $13.7 b
Commercial paper issuances by corporates rise 80%
L&T getting into power generation
ArcelorMittal looking for technology partner
‘Indian arms of foreign cos need to pay FBT on stock options’
Jaguar-Land Rover deal: Formal announcement awaited
Small, medium units set to post 65% growth in 2 years
Bank on mobiles, car batteries for financial inclusion
Essel group’s Agrani buys India beam on ProtoStar-1
Fed’s TAF programme: Just treating the symptoms?
Larsen & Toubro: Blazing a trail in engineering capability
Never mind the cost… It’s party time


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line