Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Tuesday, Feb 06, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Water
Industry & Economy - Courts/Legal Issues
Cauvery Tribunal gives final award

J. Venkatesan

Allots 419 tmc ft of water to TN, 270 tmc ft to Karnataka


Balancing act
For Tamil Nadu, 419 tmc ft (as against the demand of 562 tmc ft); Karnataka 270 tmc ft (465 tmc ft); Kerala 30 tmc ft; and Puducherry 7 tmc ft
Actual releases by Karnataka to Tamil Nadu to be 192 tmc ft annually
From this 192 tmc ft, Tamil Nadu will release 7 tmc ft to Puducherry

Advertisement
Bharat Matrimony

New Delhi Feb. 5 The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, after proceedings that went on for nearly 17 years, gave its keenly awaited final award on Monday setting out the share of waters of the Cauvery among the riparian States of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, and the Union Territory of Puducherry.

The Tribunal, comprising chairman Mr Justice N.P. Singh and members Mr N.S. Rao and Mr Sudhir Narain, in a unanimous award determined the total availability of water in the Cauvery basin at 740 thousand million cubic feet (tmc ft) at the Lower Coleroon Anicut site on the basis of 50 per cent dependability. And, in a balancing act it apportioned the total as follows: For Tamil Nadu, 419 tmc ft (as against the demand of 562 tmc ft); Karnataka 270 tmc ft (465 tmc ft); Kerala 30 tmc ft; and Puducherry 7 tmc ft. The quantum reserved for environmental protection is 10 tmc ft, and that determined for inevitable "escapages" into the sea is 4 tmc ft.

The Tribunal, constituted on June 2, 1990, in an interim award on June 25, 1991, had directed Karnataka to release 205 tmc ft each year to Tamil Nadu at Mettur. Of this, Tamil Nadu was to release 6 tmc ft to Puducherry.

Final award

As per the final award, Tamil Nadu's share to be released by Karnataka at the Biligundulu gauging station is 182 tmc ft, in addition to 10 tmc ft for environmental purposes. From this 192 tmc ft, Tamil Nadu will release 7 tmc ft to Puducherry. The Tribunal's award will come into effect within 90 days of its notification by the Centre.

The order said that the available utilisable waters during a water year (June 1 to May 31) would include those carried over from the previous water year as assessed on June 1 on the basis of storage on that date in all the reservoirs concerned, with an effective storage capacity of 3 tmc ft and above.

The order directed that "any upper riparian State shall not take any action so as to affect the scheduled deliveries of water to the lower riparian States.

However, the States concerned can by mutual agreement and in consultation with the Regulatory Authority make any amendment in the pattern of water deliveries."

It added: "In case the yield of [the] Cauvery basin is less in a distress year, the allocated shares shall be proportionately reduced among the States of Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry."

The Centre set up in 1998 the Cauvery River Authority, headed by the Prime Minister, to monitor the implementation of the interim award. However, Tamil Nadu insisted that the Tribunal evolve a mechanism to implement the final award effectively.

Accordingly, the Tribunal in its order has directed that a Regulatory Authority be set up to monitor releases for a period of five years with the help of the States concerned and the Central Water Commission (CWC). If, thereafter, any modification or adjustment was needed in the schedule, it might be worked out in consultation with the party-States and the help of the CWC for future adoption. But this has to be done without changing the annual allocation among the parties.

The award clarifies that the use of underground waters by any of the riparian States and Puducherry should not be reckoned as use of the Cauvery water.

Hydel projects

Taking note of moves to set up hydel projects, the Tribunal said that whenever any such project was commissioned and water was stored in a reservoir, the pattern of downstream releases should be consistent with the final order, in order that the irrigation requirements were not jeopardised.

More Stories on : Water | Courts/Legal Issues

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Hiring

Stories in this Section
Bank GDRs: RBI move to curb depositories interference


Govt may allow FDI in cargo airlines
Industry for dumping duty on Chinese equipment
IDEA Cellular eyes IPO market for expansion
Price tremors set to intensify, trouble Govt
IOC plans to retain IBP brand post-merger
Rlys hopes to gain nearly Rs 1,700 cr selling scrap
Cauvery Tribunal gives final award
Cauvery delta farmers welcome verdict
Govt seeks to reclassify sectors for coal supplies
A car that runs on compressed air?
Tata Group may bid for Actis' stake in Punjab Tractors
`Chip industry has scope to create 9 million jobs'
Hold home loan rates, Chidambaram tells banks
Benchmarks continue to touch new highs
Fall in LME prices hits metal stocks
Gabriel India up on growth hopes
Asian Paints: Betting on global reach


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line