Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Oct 16, 2005


Investment World
Features
Stocks
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Investment World - Courts/Legal Issues
Money & Banking - General Insurance
Columns - Law Lane


Four deposits after a fatality

JULY 5, 2002: Satheesh Kumar was riding a Hero Honda motorcycle. A bus of TNSTC Ltd hit the bike, causing serious injuries to Satheesh. He was taken to the Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, where he died. His widow, children and mother filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Neyyattinkara, seeking a compensation of Rs 25 lakh.

The Tribunal noted that Satheesh's monthly income, as `Upper Division Clerk in Civil Supplies Corporation', was Rs 5,843 and deducted one-third towards personal expenses to work out the contribution to the family as Rs 3,896 p.m. and annual dependency at Rs 46,752. Since Satheesh was 34 when the accident snatched his life, the Tribunal applied a multiplier of 17 and arrived at Rs 7,94,784. To this was added Rs 40,000, "for pain and sufferings, loss of love and affection, transportation, post-mortem and funeral expenditure". Thus, the Tribunal awarded Rs 8,34,784 as compensation.

Producing `evidence of a passenger in the bus', TNSTC challenged the award before the High Court on several grounds: such as, allegation of `contributory negligence' of the bike-rider, no loss of dependency as Satheesh's wife "got a clerical job on compassionate ground", and a high multiplier. However, the High Court felt that there was no scope for any interference with the Tribunal's order. So, TNSTC proceeded to the Supreme Court.

There, Justices Arijit Pasayat and Arun Kumar heard the case. They could not find any evidence of contributory negligence; nor did they find appealing the evidence of the bus passenger, on which TNSTC strong relied. "There was no definite material to infer that the deceased by his negligent acts contributed to the accident," reads the text of the apex court's judgment dated October 5.

The next question before the Supreme Court was whether the compensation was on the higher side. "Actual pecuniary loss can be ascertained only by balancing, on the one hand, the loss to the claimant of the future pecuniary benefit and, on the other, any pecuniary advantage which from whatever sources comes to them by reason of the death," noted the court, citing Gobald Motor Service Ltd vs R.M.K. Veluswami.

The choice of the multiplier is determined by the age of the deceased (or that of the claimants, whichever is higher) and by the calculation as to what capital sum, if invested at a rate of interest appropriate to a stable economy, would yield the multiplicand by way of annual interest, informs the judgment.

The multiplier has to serve as a guide, not an invariable ready-reckoner, pointed out the court citing the Trilok Chandra case, and fixed the multiplier in Satheesh's case as 13.

"Instead of Rs 8,34,794 the claimants will be entitled to Rs 6 lakh," ruled the court, and awarded 7.5 per cent interest "from the date of application till payment after adjustment of amount, if any, paid".

The court directed how the compensation should be deployed: Rs 50,000 as fixed deposit in the name of the mother; and Rs 1.5 lakh each in the names of the other three, for five years, with the facility to withdraw monthly interest. The deposits in the names of the two children should be renewed till they attain majority, said the court.

"No loan or advance of any type shall be permitted against the fixed deposits without leave of the Tribunal. Respondents if, however, to meet any urgent need for money, they may make application to the Tribunal for permitting withdrawal," directed the court.

LawLane@TheHindu.co.in

D. Murali

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Tata Safari Dicor

Stories in this Section
i-flex solutions: Reject


Bargain airfares: Spoilt for choice
In a long bull market — The misses that became hits
Towards sustainable stock market liquidity
Reliance Industries: The mechanics of the demerger
Four deposits after a fatality
Sundaram Select Focus: Sell
HDFC Core & Satellite Fund: Buy
Canbank MF launches new scheme
Tata Investment Corporation: Buy
TCS: Buy
Infosys: Buy
Pfizer: Hold
MICO: Buy
Alok Industries: Hold
Further weakness likely in Nifty
Tata Steel in oversold zone
Focus of the week
Query corner
Bridgestone's festival offer
GM may drive into the compact space with Aveo
Turbo-charged Indica V2
Mindset of the car buyer
New City
Tata Motors indicates price hike
Traders vs investors
Public announcement in takeovers
Options guide
Fenner India: Park your funds in one-year option
`We will continue with the dividend policy' — Mr Sanjay Sinha, Fund Manager, UTI Mutual Fund
Getting around the housing loan
Assessing the AO
K. M. Sugar: Avoid
Gujarat Industries Power Company: Avoid
Rules for getting rich slowly


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright 2005, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line