Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Saturday, Feb 17, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Mutual Funds
Markets - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings
Government - Policy
MIN may not be needed for MF investments

N.K. Kurup

Advertisement
Bharat Matrimony

Mumbai Feb 16 The requirement of a unique identification number for investing in mutual funds, known as MIN, will be done away with.

According to information available, mutual funds will be asked to follow the Finance Ministry's suggestion of making PAN compulsory for mutual fund applications.

The Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI), in consultation with the SEBI, is expected to make an announcement to this effect shortly.

The association had made MIN compulsory for investments of Rs 50,000 and above in mutual funds from January 1, 2007.

The mutual fund identification number was introduced to free investors from the hassle of providing documents every time they make an investment in a mutual fund.

Quoting MIN, investors could invest in the scheme of any mutual fund without submitting know-your-customer documents.

All mutual funds had made special arrangements with CDSL Ventures for processing documents and issuing MIN to investors free of cost.

Mr A.P. Kurian, Chairman of AMFI, said that though MIN may not be mandatory, investors would still have to go through the process of getting the MIN to be able to invest in mutual funds.

Mutual funds will have to follow the enhanced know-your-customers norms and for this purpose they would require a number of documents such as photograph, proof of residence, PAN, etc., from investors.

According to sources, the Finance Ministry is against asking investors to obtain more than one identification number.

The SEBI had earlier introduced MAPIN and subsequently suspended it.

Several investors had obtained this number from SEBI-appointed agencies at their own cost.

Afterwards, PAN was made compulsory for all investors in the equity market, followed by MIN. All these have created confusion among investors, said an analyst.

More Stories on : Mutual Funds | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings | Policy

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Hiring

Stories in this Section
El Nino diminishing; prospects up for La Nina


Taxes and levies: Cement is the beast of burden
Forex reserves jump $5 billion on strong FII inflows
IT: One out of six is an Indian
Tata group set to enter airport modernisation biz
MIN may not be needed for MF investments
Cairn proposes global expert to benchmark Rajasthan crude
Ethanol, cogen help sugar mills stay afloat
`RBI moves may not impact property prices much'
India, main offshore delivery centre for majors
Amul, Nestle whip up curd biz
PwC to advise Rlys on factories


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line